2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure criterion for steel pipe elbows under cyclic loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed value of constant b in Equations (3) and (4) is 0.025 [41]. This damage index was used to express the damage to the carbon steel pipe elbows [24]. However, this damage index is less reliable for steel structures [42].…”
Section: Damage Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The proposed value of constant b in Equations (3) and (4) is 0.025 [41]. This damage index was used to express the damage to the carbon steel pipe elbows [24]. However, this damage index is less reliable for steel structures [42].…”
Section: Damage Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Equations (5) and (6), 1.1 and 0.38 were proposed for constants c and d [42]. This damage index was used to express the seismic capacity of carbon steel pipe elbows together with the damage index of Park and Ang [24,25].…”
Section: Damage Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There were several recent studies both experimental and numerical addressing the problem of structural integrity and life of carbon steel elbows under severe loading conditions [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Fatigue life was mainly considered around 50-300 cycles, as this range is representative of a typical earthquake loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7] However, bends and elbows over time are subjected to the flow accelerated corrosion leading to the localised wall thinning. [8][9][10] Therefore, it is important to understand the effect of these structural defects on the strength in order to maintain the safety and integrity of hazardous structures. This problem was also emphasised during investigations of the integrity and residual strength of piping containing wall thinning defects after recent powerful earthquakes in Japan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%