Proceedings of the 37th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.98CH36171)
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.1998.761963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure detection and identification and fault tolerant control using the IMM-KF with applications to the Eagle-Eye UAV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(3) achieves the maximum value of right hand side in equation (1). If the policy is calculated using (2) with the solution of (3), it will be optimal with respect to (1).…”
Section: B Mdp Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(3) achieves the maximum value of right hand side in equation (1). If the policy is calculated using (2) with the solution of (3), it will be optimal with respect to (1).…”
Section: B Mdp Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. 1 have proposed a fault tolerant control scheme where the post-detection control law is a weighted sum of the stabilizing controllers for different failure modes. In this formulation, the weight on each control law depends upon the probability of the corresponding failure as predicted by the detection scheme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mode probabilities of the IMM have been used before to diagnose faults. In [Me95], [Me98], [Ra98], [Zh97] raw sensor data outputs were assumed to have been modeled both in normal and all abnormal operation modes, and a jump from one mode to another would announce itself via the IMM mode probabilities -this is the usual application of the IMM to system diagnosis, and while it has shown very nice results its weaknesses are a need for precise modeling in the domain of the raw signal, and a lack of prognostic information. The approach of this paper uses a simple suite of relatively untuned kinematic models on the sensor-alarm probabilities: there is little need for modeling beyond what is known in the system dependency matrix, and the prognostic information is rich.…”
Section: Terminal State Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnostic method presented in the article is valid only for the control surface FDI. In (Zhang & Li, 1997;Rago et al, 1998) the algorithms for detection and diagnosis of multiple failures in a dynamic system are described. They are based on the Interacting Multiple-Model (IMM) estimation algorithm, which is one of the most cost-effective adaptive estimation techniques for systems involving structural as well as parametric changes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm consists of a "front end" estimator for the control system, composed of a bank of parallel Kalman filters, each matched to a specific hypothesis about the failure status of the system (fully functional or a failure in any one sensor or actuator), and a means of blending the filter outputs through a probability-weighted average. In methods described in (Zhang & Li, 1997;Rago et al, 1998;Maybeck, 1999), the faults are assumed to be known, and the Kalman filters are designed for the known sensor/actuator faults. As the approach requires several parallel Kalman filters, and the faults should be known, it can be used in limited applications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%