2017
DOI: 10.2991/ijcis.2017.10.1.67
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure Mode and Effect Analysis using Soft Set Theory and COPRAS Method

Abstract: Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is a risk management technique frequently applied to enhance the system performance and safety. In recent years, many researchers have shown an intense interest in improving FMEA due to inherent weaknesses associated with the classical risk priority number (RPN) method. In this study, we develop a new risk ranking model for FMEA based on soft set theory and COPRAS method, which can deal with the limitations and enhance the performance of the conventional FMEA. First, tra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Garg [71] designed the COPRAS based framework to evaluate the desirable e-learning website. Wang et al [72] implemented a soft set based COPRAS technique to estimate the risk model for failure mode and effect analysis. Mahdiraji et al [73] identified, ordered, and assessed the ecological sustainability factors of sustainable architecture through triangular fuzzy COPRAS and Best Worst Method (BWM) approaches.…”
Section: Complex Proportional Assessment (Copras) Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Garg [71] designed the COPRAS based framework to evaluate the desirable e-learning website. Wang et al [72] implemented a soft set based COPRAS technique to estimate the risk model for failure mode and effect analysis. Mahdiraji et al [73] identified, ordered, and assessed the ecological sustainability factors of sustainable architecture through triangular fuzzy COPRAS and Best Worst Method (BWM) approaches.…”
Section: Complex Proportional Assessment (Copras) Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of the merits of the VIKOR model in considering the compromise between group utility maximization and individual regret minimization, in recent years, it has been recognized as a meaningful tool that can be applied to many decision areas. In previous literature, some traditional decision models have been applied to MADM problems, such as the ELECTRE model [1][2][3][4], the MABAC model [5][6][7], the COPRAS model [8,9], the TOPSIS model [10][11][12], The TODIM model [13][14][15], and the GRA model [16][17][18]. Compared with the above methods, the VIKOR model not only considers the objectivity of the decision maker and the complexity of the decision-making environment, but also considers the conflict criteria, so as to obtain more effective and accurate evaluation results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many MCDM techniques, which can utilized in different decision-making problem including TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution), DEMATEL (decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory), AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process), GRA (Grey Relation Analysis), Distance measures, TOPSIS, VIKOR (VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje), PROMETHEE (Preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation), ELECTRE (elimination and choice expressing reality), and BWM (Best-worst method).. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Therefore, scientifically expressing decision-making problems and funding mathematic-based techniques to improve the viability of prioritizing alternatives is vital. [39][40][41] Some engineering applications have been done by many scholars as follows. Thus, subjectivity needs to be handled in a realistic case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[36][37][38] Typically, Choquet integral application has been extensively increased in the risk assessment procedure to track risk evaluation problems dealing with the risk factors. [39][40][41] Some engineering applications have been done by many scholars as follows. The interaction relationships between multiple risk factors in earthquake vulnerability assessment process are analyzed by Moradi et al, 42 finding the best applicable solution dealing with soil erosion in Turkey, 43 and screening the geological CO 2 storage sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%