Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) for Medical Devices: Does Standardization Foster Improvements in the Practice?

Abstract

Risk analysis techniques received increasing attention in the health care sector in the last 30 years. These techniques are diffused\ud for health care processes, and less for devices. In fact, risk management for medical devices was introduced only recently (ISO\ud 14971 in 2000 and GHTF/SG3/N15R8 in 2005) [1,2]. The goal of this study is twofold. First, we aim at evaluating the state of\ud the art of the diffusion of standards for the risk assessment of medical devices (with a focus on FMECA). Second, we evaluate\ud the impact of risk assessment techniques on the practice. To pursue the first goal, a literature review has been performed through\ud the investigation of medical and non-medical databases. To reach the second objective, we selected a leading Company in the\ud development of medical devices and we investigated the process enacted to evaluate the risk connected to the design of new\ud devices. The literature search confirmed the widespread application of the FMECA, the scant number of contributions about its\ud applications on medical devices, and the main limitations related to the use of this technique. The empirical investigation showed\ud that the Company spends a surprising amount of time and resources to set and deploy the FMEA rigorously, and it follows the\ud passages envisioned by the literature carefully, with the unique intent to respect the standards. A gap emerges among the\ud practitioners and academic words, with two possible explanations. First, the academics are not addressing the managerial and\ud practical implications of their contributions; in so doing they deepen the “theory versus practice” chasm. Second, the presence of\ud standards actually discourages the practitioners to push over and find new solutions

Analysis of Failures and Influence Factors of Critical Infrastructures: A Case of Metro

“…It is a systematic procedure to identify potential failure modes, cause, and effect on system performance. Given the prominent efficiency and effect on identifying failure modes and root causes of undesired consequences, this effective approach has widely been applied to various industries such as aircraft equipment [38], medicinal devices [39], and shipbuilding industry [23].…”

Critical failures in the use of home ventilation medical equipment

“…Particularly FMECA (a logical extension of FMEA -Failure Mode Effect Analysis) and HFMEA ™ -Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis) are among the most popular proactive methods in health care [10]. FMECA methodolgy is mainly used in manufacturing [13] and it has been recently demonstrated that is a valid risk assessment tool to analyse process involving medical devices [22], risk assessment of medical device [11,23] also in home ventilation [10]. On the contrary, HFMEA ™ is more oriented to the analysis of clinical processes (such as nursing and other clinical aspects) [4,10,21].…”

Cartilage Tissue Engineering by Extrusion Bioprinting: Process Analysis, Risk Evaluation, and Mitigation Strategies

“…Despite encouraging results in the 3D bioprinting technology, there is still a gap between the research applications and their clinical use due to several issues that need to be addressed [15]. Optimizing and standardizing this process in the research phase is pivotal for fostering its proper and faster translation into clinics [16]. To the best of our knowledge, no studies have described, in a step-by-step fashion, the sequential phases of a bioprinting process with its respective failure modes and mitigation actions.…”