2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2014.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure modeling of an electrical N-component framework by the non-stationary Markovian arrival process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have considered three inter-failure times because there are enough arrivals to establish correlations between the inter-failure times. On the other hand there are studies with more operational inter-failure times as [5] among others.…”
Section: The Data: Inter-failure Timesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We have considered three inter-failure times because there are enough arrivals to establish correlations between the inter-failure times. On the other hand there are studies with more operational inter-failure times as [5] among others.…”
Section: The Data: Inter-failure Timesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to compare the MAP model developed in the previous section with the state of the art we choose the most recently model using the MAP methodology [5]. We apply to our data the 2-state non-stationary Markovian Arrival Process, in its canonical representation, denoted by M AP 2 .…”
Section: The 2-state Non-stationary Markovian Arrival Process (M Ap 2 )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The identifiability of the process is of crucial importance when inference is to be considered as we plan to do as future work. Either from a Bayesian viewpoint as in the work of Scott in year 1999 or in the work of Ramírez‐Cobo et al in year 2017 or from a moment‐matching method as in the work of Rodríguez et al, a statistical inference approach may be defined for fitting real data sets. On the other hand, the nonnegativity of the autocorrelation function of the batch sizes of the B M M P P 2 ( K ) is proven.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%