dWe compared Etest and disk diffusion to broth microdilution for the detection of fluoroquinolone resistance in 135 typhoidal and nontyphoidal serovars of Salmonella. Categorical agreements for the ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin Etests were 89.6 and 83.7%, respectively. Disk diffusion categorical agreements were 88.2 and 93.3%, respectively. Only minor errors were observed. S almonella gastroenteritis is normally a self-limiting disease, and antimicrobial therapy is not generally recommended (1, 2). However, antimicrobial therapy is indicated for the management of severe diarrhea or extraintestinal infection caused by Salmonella spp. and for the treatment of enteric fever, which is caused by Salmonella enterica serovars Typhi and Paratyphi A, B, and C. The fluoroquinolones ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin are important agents for the treatment of these infections (3). Fluoroquinolone resistance in Salmonella is a significant clinical concern, particularly among typhoid serovars of Salmonella isolated in Asia. The most common fluoroquinolone resistance mechanism among these isolates is mutation to the quinolone resistance-determining region (QRDR) of the topoisomerase gene gyrA, resulting in elevated ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin MICs (0.12 to 0.5 g/ml) and full resistance to the quinolone nalidixic acid (MIC, Ն32 g/ml) (4). Patients infected with such isolates have delayed responses to fluoroquinolone therapy and, in many cases, clinical failures (4). As such, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) has historically instructed laboratories to perform a nalidixic acid disk diffusion or MIC test in order to screen for this resistance mechanism among Salmonella isolates for which susceptibility testing was warranted (4). However, fluoroquinolone resistance in Salmonella can also be attributed to mutation to the QRDR of other topoisomerase genes (gyrB, parC/E) or by the acquisition of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinants, such as the qnr and aac(6=)-Ib-cr genes. In contrast to QRDR topoisomerase mutations, isolates with fluoroquinolone resistance associated with plasmid-mediated mechanisms are not necessarily resistant to nalidixic acid (5).In 2013, the CLSI revised the ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and ofloxacin MIC interpretive criteria (breakpoints) for Salmonella and the disk diffusion breakpoints for ciprofloxacin, in part to better detect these fluoroquinolone resistance mechanisms in Salmonella spp. (Table 1) (6). At present, no levofloxacin or ofloxacin disk diffusion breakpoints for Salmonella have been established by the CLSI. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has accordingly revised the ciprofloxacin MIC interpretive criteria for S. enterica serovar Typhi but not for other Salmonella serovars or for levofloxacin or ofloxacin. Furthermore, no commercial MIC susceptibility test panels produced in the United States contain fluoroquinolone concentrations low enough to allow use of the current CLSI breakpoints. Thus, laboratories in the United States have the option of perf...