1995
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0887-3828(1995)9:1(4)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure of Lacey V. Murrow Floating Bridge, Seattle, Washington

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cross section is simplified as a rectangular, which has the width b=8.0m and height h=1.5m. So we give the cross sectional moment of inertia I=bh 3 /12=2.25m 4 . We choose two kinds of materials, aluminum and epoxy resin.…”
Section: Band Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cross section is simplified as a rectangular, which has the width b=8.0m and height h=1.5m. So we give the cross sectional moment of inertia I=bh 3 /12=2.25m 4 . We choose two kinds of materials, aluminum and epoxy resin.…”
Section: Band Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a kind of structure with relatively good flexibility, flexural vibrations caused by vehicles, wind and wave would affect its reliability. Many researches have been done in order to investigate its dynamic behaviors induced by wave, moving loads and other environmental loads [3][4][5][6][7]. The dynamic behaviors and vibration control methods of these widely used structures are constantly concerned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many important structures in engineering, such as the floating bridges 9–11, railroad tracks 12–14, highway pavements 15–17 and continuously supported pipelines 18–20, could be simplified as a model of beams on an elastic foundation. The dynamic behaviors and vibration control methods of these widely used structures are constantly concerned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…xvi Figure 2.9 Time histories of maximum deflections due to one-and two-wheel loads (Thambiratnam and Zhuge 1996) Figure 2.10 Plan view of the proposed floating bridge (Seif and Koulaei 2005) 35 Figure 2.11 Cut-away of typical pontoon of Lacey V. Murrow Floating Bridge (Dusenberry et al 1995) Figure 2.12 Structure arrangement of pontoon-type very large floating structure (Fujikubo and Tetsuya 2001) Figure 2.13 Modeling of bridge-vehicle system using single-axle vehicle model (Humar and Kashif 1993) Figure 2.14 Two-axle vehicle model (Humar and Kashif 1993) Figure 2.15 Dynamic response of the bridge to single-and two-axle vehicle loads (Humar and Kashif 1993) .21 Dynamic analysis procedures for bridge and vehicle interaction (Henchi et al 1998) 48 Figure 2.22 Schematic illustration of vehicle-bridge interaction (Yang and Wu 2001)..50…”
Section: List Of Appendices XXXImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water getting inside the units of the floating bridge can cause the bridge to fail or sink. Dusenberry et al (1995) Figure 2.11 Cut-away of typical pontoon of Lacey V. Murrow Floating Bridge (Dusenberry et al 1995) Fujikubo and Tetsuya (2001) introduced a model for the structural design of Very Large Floating Structures (VLFS) of several thousand meters long by developing a hierarchical system of structural analysis. The structural analysis for such huge floating structures using the normal procedure of the finite element method encompasses a large number of structural nodes required for reasonable accuracy of the analysis.…”
Section: Analysis and Design Of Floating Bridgesmentioning
confidence: 99%