Failure of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy – Further Procedure?

Abstract

Background: Worldwide, the incidence of morbid obesity is increasing, and surgery is the only effective longterm treatment. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is associated with acceptable weight loss and reduced comorbidities. It is considered a safe procedure with sporadic complications. This publication aims to describe failures of LSG in terms of ineffective weight loss or early weight regain, and analyze secondary treatment options. Methods: From October 2001 to December 2010, 937 patients underwent LSG in our department. Initially, all procedures were scheduled as a two-stage procedure (LSG followed by biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch). However, the second procedure was not performed in 64 patients (body mass index > 60 kg/m²). Since 2005, the frequency of second stage procedures after weight regain has been increasing; their outcome is analyzed. Results: Of the 937 patients, 17 (1.8%) experienced staple line leakage. Mean time to first reintervention or endoscopic stent placement was 15.6 ± 22 days (range 2–78). From 2005 to 2010, 106 secondary procedures were performed. Insufficient weight loss or weight regain were the indications in 88 cases. Sixteen (15%) patients had severe gastroesophageal reflux which was resolved by Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Stenosis was observed in 2 (2.6%) patients, which required endoscopic dilatation and stent placement in one case and gastric bypass in the other. Conclusions: LSG is a feasible and popular bariatric procedure. Mortality (0.4%) was much higher than after gastric bypass (0.03%) and gastric banding (0%) The knowledge of potential complications and their management is crucial. All restrictive procedures require patient compliance, but increased food uptake after RYGB and LSG is common. Malabsorptive procedures are more effective for long-term weight loss. Duodenal switch and omega-loop gastric bypass are more efficient second stage procedures than re-sleeve or RYGB.

Interdisciplinary European guidelines on metabolic and bariatric surgery

“…If medically indicated and if such a patient is willing, further bariatric surgery should be considered (EL B, C, D [229][230][231][232][233][234][235][236][237][238][239][240][241][242] ).…”

Residual fundus or neofundus after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: is fundectomy safe and effective as revision surgery?

“…However, up to 30 % of patients who have undergone LSG require revision surgery for inadequate weight loss, weight regain, or the development of severe upper gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms [mainly gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD)] [1,4]. Weight regain or insufficient weight loss can be successfully managed with conversion to laparoscopic gastric bypass (LRYGB) or duodenal switch (DS), both of which also help to relieve the symptoms of GERD [4].…”

“…Weight regain or insufficient weight loss can be successfully managed with conversion to laparoscopic gastric bypass (LRYGB) or duodenal switch (DS), both of which also help to relieve the symptoms of GERD [4].…”

Mini-Gastric Bypass for Bariatric Surgery Increasing Worldwide

“…After LSG [32] and RYGB [49][50][51], weight regain has been found in the long-term. Comparative studies have documented more durable weight loss after the MGB [3,13,22,[52][53][54][55].…”

“…After the lap-band or LSG, the MGB is being used as a salvage for weight regain [4,32]. In long-term follow-up after LSG, sleeve dilatation and weight regain are frequently found [33].…”