2010
DOI: 10.3109/10428190903572219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure of molecular diagnostics in chronic myeloid leukemia: an aberrant form of e13a2BCR–ABLtranscript causing false-negative results by standard polymerase chain reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), BCR-ABL fusion (e13a2 and e14a2) is one of the most common molecular alterations [82]. A standard PCR test may provide false-negative results in diagnosing e13a2 BCR-ABL fusion in CML [18]. Cordeiro et al (2016) [82] developed AuNPs-based gold-nano beacons (Au-Nbac), in combination with Förster resonance energy transfer-based spectral codification, to detect e13a2 and e14a2 fusion.…”
Section: Nucleic-acids Biomarker Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), BCR-ABL fusion (e13a2 and e14a2) is one of the most common molecular alterations [82]. A standard PCR test may provide false-negative results in diagnosing e13a2 BCR-ABL fusion in CML [18]. Cordeiro et al (2016) [82] developed AuNPs-based gold-nano beacons (Au-Nbac), in combination with Förster resonance energy transfer-based spectral codification, to detect e13a2 and e14a2 fusion.…”
Section: Nucleic-acids Biomarker Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunotherapy, radioimmunotherapy, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, hematopoietic-cell transplantation, and BM transplantation improve the survival of patients with HMs [13][14][15][16]. However, due to the heterogeneity and long-term indolent phase, early diagnosis and treatment of HMs remain a challenging issue [12,[17][18][19]. Additionally, following therapy, accurate diagnosis of MRD sometimes could not be possible due to false-negative or false-positive results from PCR, FC, and NGS tests [20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insertion of 21 nucleotides of ABL1 intron 1 at the BCR-ABL1 fusion site was first described in a CML patient in 1998 by Rubinstein and Purves [9]. Other variable size insertions of ABL1 intron 1 with apparent false-negative result in RT-qPCR were described in subsequent years [9][10][11]. Despite qualitative NESTED PCR and Sanger sequencing remain useful to diagnose and identify the BCR-ABL1 transcripts, ddPCR technology have been effective in quantifying atypical BCR-ABL1 fusions in Ph+ leukemia, leading an absolute quantification without the need of a standard curve preparation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%