Background
Definitive treatment of Graves' disease includes radioactive iodine (RAI) and thyroidectomy, but utilization varies. We hypothesize that, in addition to clinical reasons, there are socioeconomic factors that influence whether a patient undergoes thyroidectomy or RAI.
Methods
Patients treated for Graves' disease between 8/2007 and 9/2013 at our university hospital were included. A comparative analysis of clinical and socioeconomic factors was completed.
Results
Of 427 patients, 300 (70%) underwent RAI while 127 (30%) underwent surgery. Multiple factors were associated with surgery: younger age (mean 36 vs. 41 years old, p<0.01), female gender (33% vs. 19% males, p=0.01), black race (56% vs. 28% non-black, p<0.01), Medicaid or uninsured (43% vs. 27% private insurance or Medicare, p<0.01), ophthalmopathy (38% vs. 26%, p< 0.01), goiter (35% vs. 23%, p<0.01), lowest quartile of median household income (38% vs. 27% upper three quartiles, p=0.03). Thyroidectomy increased annually, with 52% undergoing surgery during the final year (p<0.01). Adjusting for confounding, younger age (OR 1.04; 95% CI 1.02, 1.05), female gender (OR 2.06; 95% CI 1.06, 4.01), ophthalmopathy (OR 2.35; 95% CI 1.40, 3.96), and later year of treatment (OR 1.66; 95% CI 1.41, 1.95) remained significantly associated with surgery.
Conclusions
Surgery has now become the primary treatment modality of choice for Graves' disease at our institution. Clinical factors are the main drivers behind treatment choice, but patients with lower SES are more likely to have clinical features best treated with surgery, underlying the importance of improving access to quality surgical care for all patients.