2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2014.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure of the Weierstrass Preparation Theorem in quasi-analytic Denjoy–Carleman rings

Abstract: It is shown that Denjoy-Carleman quasi-analytic rings of germs of functions in two or more variables fail to satisfy the Weierstrass Preparation Theorem. The result is proven via a non-extension theorem.2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 26E10; 32B05; Secondary 46E25.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar property has been announced in [1] for quasianalytic Denjoy-Carleman classes. More precisely, the statement made in [1] claims that if a Denjoy-Carleman class contains strictly the analytic system, then Weierstrass preparation does not hold, even if we allow the unit and the distinguished polynomial to be in any wider quasianalytic Denjoy-Carleman class.…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar property has been announced in [1] for quasianalytic Denjoy-Carleman classes. More precisely, the statement made in [1] claims that if a Denjoy-Carleman class contains strictly the analytic system, then Weierstrass preparation does not hold, even if we allow the unit and the distinguished polynomial to be in any wider quasianalytic Denjoy-Carleman class.…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
“…A similar property has been announced in [1] for quasianalytic Denjoy-Carleman classes. More precisely, the statement made in [1] claims that if a Denjoy-Carleman class contains strictly the analytic system, then Weierstrass preparation does not hold, even if we allow the unit and the distinguished polynomial to be in any wider quasianalytic Denjoy-Carleman class. The approach there, pretty different from ours, leads to a precise investigation of the following extension problem: does a function belonging to a quasianalytic Denjoy-Carleman class defined on the positive real axis extend to a function belonging to a wider Denjoy-Carleman class defined on the real axis?…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
“…which is (1). (2) is obvious either again from Faà di Bruno's formula, or by looking at the formal power series of g at 0.…”
Section: A Smooth Function Which Is Quasianalytic On Every Curve (Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite quasianalytic classes satisfying "quasianalytic continuation", their theory remains not well-understood. This is in a large because many standard techniques for analytic functions, namely the Weierstrass division and preparation theorems, fail in general for quasianalytic Denjoy-Carleman classes (see [1,8,9,13,15]). This makes deciding whether these classes are Noetherian very difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6]) and even the Weierstrass preparation theorem (cf. [1]). Neither do more general quasianalytic local rings defined by imposing certain natural axioms (stability by composition, implicit function theorem and monomial division); see [9] for Weierstrass division and [16] for Weierstrass preparation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%