1967
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9394(67)94150-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure of Trachoma Treatment with Ophthalmic Antibiotics and Systemic Sulfonamides Used Alone or in Combination with Trachoma Vaccine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Six trials compare topical tetracycline with placebo or no treatment [27][28][29][30][31][32]. One of these is excluded because it is not possible to identify patient outcomes: in some instances, both eyes of the same subject were used (separately) in the randomization; the results are reported by eye rather than by subject [31].…”
Section: Evidence For the Efficacy Of Topical Tetracyclinementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Six trials compare topical tetracycline with placebo or no treatment [27][28][29][30][31][32]. One of these is excluded because it is not possible to identify patient outcomes: in some instances, both eyes of the same subject were used (separately) in the randomization; the results are reported by eye rather than by subject [31].…”
Section: Evidence For the Efficacy Of Topical Tetracyclinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of these is excluded because it is not possible to identify patient outcomes: in some instances, both eyes of the same subject were used (separately) in the randomization; the results are reported by eye rather than by subject [31]. Of the remaining five trials, four [27,29,30,32] permit evaluation of topical tetracycline against no treatment and one [28] permits evaluation of topical tetracycline against oral placebo.…”
Section: Evidence For the Efficacy Of Topical Tetracyclinementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In all, 10 of the 13 papers that were reviewed only considered the treatment of individuals, not mass community-wide treatment, and thus should have been excluded from analysis as they did not deal with the question asked. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] Secondly, three of the reviewed studies assessed antibiotics that are no longer used in trachoma-control programmes. 11 13 15 Thirdly, the strict inclusion criteria used by the Cochrane Database limited the review to RCTs and meant that good evidence from cohort studies, such as those mentioned above, was not considered.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%