1994
DOI: 10.1097/00008877-199404000-00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and CP 55,940 to maintain intravenous self-administration under a fixed-interval schedule in rhesus monkeys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
63
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
63
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there are many variations to this basic experimental procedure, a commonly used method for assessing the reinforcing efficacy of a test drug in experimental animals is to compare self-administration of the drug to self-administration of a standard drug of known abuse potential and to a vehicle control in the same subject (e.g., Johanson and Balster, 1978;Bergman and Johanson, 1985;Tanda et al, 2000). These studies are usually performed in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) or rats that have learned to self-administer a prototypical drug of abuse, such as cocaine or codeine, under a schedule requiring a fixed number of responses to obtain each injection (e.g., a 10-response, fixed-ratio schedule of drug injection, FR10) (Goldberg et al, 1971;Goldberg, 1973;Marquis et al, 1989;Mansbach et al, 1994;Tanda et al, 2000). The drugs to be tested are then substituted for the training drug and evaluated for their ability to maintain levels of responding greater than those maintained during vehicle substitution.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Reinforcing Effects Of Thc And Other Synthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although there are many variations to this basic experimental procedure, a commonly used method for assessing the reinforcing efficacy of a test drug in experimental animals is to compare self-administration of the drug to self-administration of a standard drug of known abuse potential and to a vehicle control in the same subject (e.g., Johanson and Balster, 1978;Bergman and Johanson, 1985;Tanda et al, 2000). These studies are usually performed in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) or rats that have learned to self-administer a prototypical drug of abuse, such as cocaine or codeine, under a schedule requiring a fixed number of responses to obtain each injection (e.g., a 10-response, fixed-ratio schedule of drug injection, FR10) (Goldberg et al, 1971;Goldberg, 1973;Marquis et al, 1989;Mansbach et al, 1994;Tanda et al, 2000). The drugs to be tested are then substituted for the training drug and evaluated for their ability to maintain levels of responding greater than those maintained during vehicle substitution.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Reinforcing Effects Of Thc And Other Synthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last three decades, many attempts to demonstrate intravenous self-administration of THC or of synthetic cannabinoid CB 1 receptor agonists by experimental animals were relatively unsuccessful (Pickens et al, 1973;Kaymakcalan, 1973;Harris et al, 1974;Carney et al, 1977;van Ree et al, 1978;Mansbach et al, 1994) (Table 1). None of these studies clearly demonstrated persistent, dose-related, self-administration behavior maintained by THC or synthetic cannabinoids, which would be susceptible to vehicle extinction and subsequent reinstatement in the absence of unusual "foreign" conditions.…”
Section: Self-administration Of Cannabinoids By Laboratory Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although several groups have reported that cannabinoids produce a robust conditioned place preference (Braida et al, 2001a;Lepore et al, 1995;Valjent and Maldonado, 2000) others have reported that cannabinoids produce a conditioned place aversion (Parker and Gilles, 1995;McGregor et al, 1996;Sañudo-Pena et al, 1997). Although it has been reported that both the cannabinoid receptor agonists, WIN 55212-2 and CP55940, are self-administered by mice, an effect that is blocked by pretreatment with a CB 1 receptor antagonist rimonabant (Braida et al, 2001b;Ledent et al, 1999;Martellotta et al, 1998), there are several instances in which a failure of cannabinoid self-administration has been reported (Mansbach et al, 1994;Takahashi and Singer, 1981) . Cannabinoid receptor agonists, at low and pharmacologically meaningful doses, enhance electrical brain stimulation reward (Gardner et al, 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%