2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure prediction of composite sandwich L-joint under bending

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combined with the progressive failure analysis criterion, it is necessary to match the corresponding stiffness reduction model to comprehensively analyze the whole progressive failure process. Zeng et al 26 assumed that the corresponding material parameters will degrade to 0.001 when any failure mode occurs in the element. Qin et al 27 assumed that when fiber tensile failure and matrix failure occur, the corresponding coefficient of the material degenerates to 0.4917, and when other failure modes occur, the material parameters degenerate to 0.001.…”
Section: Progressive Failure Methods and Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combined with the progressive failure analysis criterion, it is necessary to match the corresponding stiffness reduction model to comprehensively analyze the whole progressive failure process. Zeng et al 26 assumed that the corresponding material parameters will degrade to 0.001 when any failure mode occurs in the element. Qin et al 27 assumed that when fiber tensile failure and matrix failure occur, the corresponding coefficient of the material degenerates to 0.4917, and when other failure modes occur, the material parameters degenerate to 0.001.…”
Section: Progressive Failure Methods and Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al [4] analyzed the performance of a new type of L-joint and optimized the design to enhance its bending stiffness by nearly 40%. Zeng et al [5] studied an L-joint structure similar to the one in this paper. They performed progressive failure simulations of the tensile and compressive ultimate conditions using a modified Hashin criterion combined with an instant stiffness degradation strategy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Shen Wei [6] investigated the same structure as Zeng Haiyan, but focused on the fatigue performance and developed a fatigue life calculation model based on the test results. Most of these studies [2,4,5] concentrated more on ultimate loads, while their simulation results did not match well with the damage 2 of 20 process and structural response. It is mainly due to the unique geometry of the L-joint that any influence from the damage at the transitional corner is amplified at the two ends of the joint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main cohesive interface parameters (initial stiffness K, interface strength t 0 , and fracture energy G C ) used in this numerical simulation were taken from the most similar material application in the literature [31][32][33] and listed in Table 3.…”
Section: Mechanical Properties Of Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%