2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.12.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure predictions of DP600 steel sheets using various uncoupled fracture criteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth mentioning that the shape and concavity of the FLD has strong effect on the prediction of damage location. Therefore, these results of cross-die test are different from the ones for DP600 [35].…”
Section: Cross-die Deep Drawing Testsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…It is worth mentioning that the shape and concavity of the FLD has strong effect on the prediction of damage location. Therefore, these results of cross-die test are different from the ones for DP600 [35].…”
Section: Cross-die Deep Drawing Testsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The magnitude of the errors for this load can be attributed to the different mechanical properties of DP600 steels used by [12], [5] and [11]. The data used to feed the computational model were obtained by [11] and the failure criteria calibration constants were the same used by [5] in practical and computational tests with DP600 steel.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, good agreement between the predicted results for Tresca model and the experimental data was attributable to the Tresca model being calibrated using the Nakajima specimen with plane-strain path and the failure happening in the near plane-strain condition in the critical elements. It is worth mentioning that the deformation history for different elements in the cross-die test revealed that the different elements mostly experienced a relatively linear strain path up to fracture [35]. Therefore, the nonlinear strain path did not significantly occur in the critical elements through cross-die deep drawing process.…”
Section: Metals 2018 8 X For Peer Review 12 Of 18mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It is worth mentioning that the shape and concavity of the FLD has strong effect on the prediction of damage location. Therefore, these results of cross-die test are different from the ones for DP600 [35]. Figure 15 depicts the calculated height of safe cross-die products by applying different failure models and compares them with experimental data of safe and failed products.…”
Section: Metals 2018 8 X For Peer Review 12 Of 18mentioning
confidence: 93%