2017
DOI: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.130.2.0163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failures Due to Interruptions or Distractions: A Review and a New Framework

Abstract: GeorGe a. MiChaeL Laboratoire d'étude des Mécanismes Cognitifs, université de Lyon interruptions of ongoing activities have spread since the development of and global increase in technology use and the general speeding in pace we all experience every day. their negative effects are well known: decline in performance and emotional distress. however, the literature still needs to shed light on the exact cognitive mechanisms involved in the way users decide to reply to an interruption, on the effects of interrupt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0
7

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
(235 reference statements)
2
39
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Interruptions can increase perceived workload and impair a learner's performance of cognitive tasks (e.g., slowing the task down immediately after the interruption, van de Poll and Sörqvist, 2016; forgetting to carry out a task, Terras and Ramsay, 2012). It is harder for people to resume their original task when the interruption is long or there is little opportunity to rehearse the task goal during the interruption (Monk et al, 2008; review by Couffe and Michael, 2017).…”
Section: Individual Cognitive Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interruptions can increase perceived workload and impair a learner's performance of cognitive tasks (e.g., slowing the task down immediately after the interruption, van de Poll and Sörqvist, 2016; forgetting to carry out a task, Terras and Ramsay, 2012). It is harder for people to resume their original task when the interruption is long or there is little opportunity to rehearse the task goal during the interruption (Monk et al, 2008; review by Couffe and Michael, 2017).…”
Section: Individual Cognitive Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Keeping attention and concentration on the performance of a particular task ensures the maintenance of cognitive resources during execution. Switching between tasks demands complex resources, affecting the performance and final result (48) . Thus, minimizing disruption events can contribute to safer patient care.…”
Section: Related Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interruptions affect cognitive ability, diverting the focus of information from the activity in progress due to an intrusion of a secondary task. Consequently, diverted attention predisposes to omissions and errors (48) . Cognitive overload can affect the accuracy and performance of tasks, resulting in longer completion time, which can result in damage to the patient's treatment (48) .…”
Section: Related Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interruptions are generally detrimental to the interrupted task (Couffe & Michael, 2017;Trafton & Monk, 2007). However, the 'costs' to the main task differ between internally and externally generated interruptions.…”
Section: Interruptions Due To Smartphonesmentioning
confidence: 99%