2003
DOI: 10.1002/malq.200310064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failures of GCH and the level by level equivalence between strong compactness and supercompactness

Abstract: Key words Supercompact cardinal, strongly compact cardinal, strong cardinal, measurable cardinal, nonreflecting stationary set of ordinals, level by level equivalence between strong compactness and supercompactness. MSC (2000) 03E35, 03E55We force and obtain three models in which level by level equivalence between strong compactness and supercompactness holds and in which, below the least supercompact cardinal, GCH fails unboundedly often. In two of these models, GCH fails on a set having measure 1 with respec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, and perhaps most importantly, in Theorem 1.1, it can be the case that 2 κ > κ ++ . This contrasts sharply with the results found in [2] and [1], where the structure of the class of supercompact cardinals can be arbitrary, level by level equivalence between strong compactness and supercompactness holds, yet if GCH fails at the least supercompact cardinal κ, 2 κ = κ ++ .…”
Section: If δ Is Either a Strong Cardinal Or An Inaccessible Limit Ofcontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, and perhaps most importantly, in Theorem 1.1, it can be the case that 2 κ > κ ++ . This contrasts sharply with the results found in [2] and [1], where the structure of the class of supercompact cardinals can be arbitrary, level by level equivalence between strong compactness and supercompactness holds, yet if GCH fails at the least supercompact cardinal κ, 2 κ = κ ++ .…”
Section: If δ Is Either a Strong Cardinal Or An Inaccessible Limit Ofcontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Nonetheless, it has been shown (see [1,2,4,5,6]) that this property is consistent with exotic and unusual occurrences that one would not expect in an inner model, such as significant failures of GCH. It is thus reasonable to ask how far these kinds of situations can be extended.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In [3,5,1], results concerning the possible failures of GCH that are consistent with the level by level equivalence between strong compactness and supercompactness were established. We refer readers to these papers for further details on the kinds of theorems proven.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Before presenting the proofs of our theorems, we briefly state some preliminary information. Our notation and terminology will follow that given in [1]. We do wish to mention a few things explicitly, however.…”
Section: Theorem 1 Letmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Note that earlier indestructibility theorems for the least supercompact cardinal in conjunction with level by level equivalence between strong compactness and supercompactness may be found in the papers [11], [1], [7], and [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%