2005
DOI: 10.1163/221190005x00118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fair and Equitable Treatment in Arbitral Practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is claimed that in the five short years of the 21st century, a series of arbitral awards have fleshed out the content of the fair and equitable standard of treatment. The principle sources for the structuring of this claim are: OECD (2004); Schreuer (2005). The creativity that is shown in the performance of this exercise gives an indication of the construction of the law through the employment again of low order sources of international law so that the rules could be passed off as binding on states.…”
Section: The Fair and Equitable Standard Of Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is claimed that in the five short years of the 21st century, a series of arbitral awards have fleshed out the content of the fair and equitable standard of treatment. The principle sources for the structuring of this claim are: OECD (2004); Schreuer (2005). The creativity that is shown in the performance of this exercise gives an indication of the construction of the law through the employment again of low order sources of international law so that the rules could be passed off as binding on states.…”
Section: The Fair and Equitable Standard Of Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…144 I have chosen the latter approach 145 The terms "Procedural propriety" or "due process" can also be used in order to describe this principle, see Schreuer (2005) He argued that the central test was whether the judicial act or omission "infringes any international rule aiming, either wholly or in part, at the legal protection of foreigners." He further argued that if a judgement is "in flagrant disregard of the aliens' rights", an international claim arises.…”
Section: Denial Of Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schreuer (2005) p. 357 with further references 7 OECD DAFFE/IME(2003)4/REV3 pp. 3-5 8 "every kind of asset", adding a broad, non-exhaustive list of what this might include 9 Whether the investor or the investment is the object of the fair and equitable treatment standard depend the language of the specific treaty, see e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…122 The ATHP makes clear that the responsibility not to cause transboundary pollution is a limitation on the State's "sovereign right to exploit [its] own resources pursuant to [its] own environmental and developmental policies". 123 This latter right is rooted in the principle of permanent sovereignty over natural resources ("the PSNR principle") declared in various UN General Assembly resolutions, particularly at the height of the New International Economic Order in the 1970s. 124 In turn, the PSNR principle is linked with the host State's purportedly unfettered right "[t]o regulate and exercise authority over foreign investment within its national jurisdiction in accordance with its laws and regulations and in conformity with its national objectives and priorities."…”
Section: The Agreement On Transboundary Haze Pollution and Its Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%