2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2004.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fair insurance guaranty premia in the presence of risk-based capital regulations, stochastic interest rate and catastrophe risk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Merton approach has the advantage of linking the valuation of financial claims to the firm's assets and capital structure. Thus unlike the more recent approach to incorporate jumps and to integrate with the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) in order to analyze corporate bond spreads (e.g., Collin-Dufresne et al (2012) and Coval et al (2009)), our structural model builds upon the work of Duan et al (1995), Duan and Yu (2005), and Lee and Yu (2007) to properly allow for the asset, liability, interest rate, and cat loss dynamics.…”
Section: Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Merton approach has the advantage of linking the valuation of financial claims to the firm's assets and capital structure. Thus unlike the more recent approach to incorporate jumps and to integrate with the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) in order to analyze corporate bond spreads (e.g., Collin-Dufresne et al (2012) and Coval et al (2009)), our structural model builds upon the work of Duan et al (1995), Duan and Yu (2005), and Lee and Yu (2007) to properly allow for the asset, liability, interest rate, and cat loss dynamics.…”
Section: Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Merton approach has the advantage of linking the valuation of financial claims to the firm's assets and capital structure. Thus unlike the more recent approach to incorporate jumps and to integrate with the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) in order to analyze corporate bond spreads (e.g., Collin-Dufresne et al (2012) and Coval et al (2009)), our structural model builds upon the work of Duan et al (1995), Duan and Yu (2005), and Lee and Yu (2007) to properly allow for the asset, liability, interest rate, and cat loss dynamics.…”
Section: Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main weakness of these no-arbitrage pricing models is that it is almost impossible to find financial instruments in the marketplace that can replicate exactly the cash flows of a cat bond. In addition to this weakness, some researchers (such as Duan and Yu 2005) have argued that this risk diversification or noarbitrage argument is not applicable in all situations, particularly when the disaster is large enough to affect the whole economy. Even if a disaster would not affect the whole economy, the risk may still be non-diversifiable if the probability distribution of occurrence has a thick left tail.…”
Section: Cat Bond Valuation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%