2010
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.81.012109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fair-sampling assumption is not necessary for testing local realism

Abstract: Almost all Bell inequality experiments to date have used postselection and therefore relied on the fair sampling assumption for their interpretation. The standard form of the fair sampling assumption is that the loss is independent of the measurement settings, so the ensemble of detected systems provides a fair statistical sample of the total ensemble. This is often assumed to be needed to interpret Bell inequality experiments as ruling out hidden-variable theories. Here we show that it is not necessary; the l… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Eq. (2) does not require the so-called fair-sampling condition [24,26], which is typically assumed in standard Bell experiments involving postselection to ensure that the conclusive/detected events are representative of the underlying quantum system. Most interestingly, Fig.…”
Section: Connection To Quantum State Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For instance, Eq. (2) does not require the so-called fair-sampling condition [24,26], which is typically assumed in standard Bell experiments involving postselection to ensure that the conclusive/detected events are representative of the underlying quantum system. Most interestingly, Fig.…”
Section: Connection To Quantum State Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For our purposes, we de- * limc@ornl.gov fine such quantum inputs as quantum states that are indistinguishable at the level of local operations and shared randomness (LOSR) [10], but distinguishable at the level of local quantum measurements assisted with shared entanglement (henceforth referred to as quantum strategies). In particular, our theoretical contribution recognizes that semi-quantum Bell inequalities using locally-indistinguishable quantum inputs can acquire the following two interesting properties: (1) the ability to safely perform postselection and (2) the ability to achieve higher Bell violations with decreasing measurement efficiencies [21].The first property is based on the fact that postselection strategies due to the detection loophole [22][23][24] are local filtering processes assisted with shared randomness. Thus by the above definition, it is impossible for LOSR models to produce postselected correlations that are semi-quantum nonlocal-even if arbitrarily low measurement efficiencies are allowed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the experimental scenario where noiseless amplification can only be implemented as a probabilistic heralded process, the implementation of the amplification stage after the local operations makes the detection of the correct amplified ECS state a probabilistic event which, in turns, opens up a loophole in the test to be run. In fact, this implies that only the cases where the amplification operation is successful for both involved parties of the state at hand should then be considered for the nonlocality test [23]. Such postselection step requires us to invoke a fair-sampling assumption, similarly to what is done for the well-known detection loophole in Bell-CHSH inequalities, an assumption that we will maintain throughout the paper.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our considerations we took into account experimental imperfections in the form of losses. Further analysis of the possibility of loophole-free violation and the role of fair sampling assumption similar to [30] remains to be addressed.Our approach is very likely to be developed and exploited in several quantum information tasks which are of great technological interest. For example, recently the idea of partial characterization of the devices has been developed and has been expressed in terms of semi-deviceindependent scenarios [31].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%