2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fairly assessing unfairness: An exploration of gender disparities in informal entrepreneurship amongst academics in business schools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These social beliefs often place stronger limitations on women’s access to the necessary resources for entrepreneurship than on men’s access to the same resources. Second, cultural and institutional barriers may discourage women from choosing entrepreneurship as a career path, as these barriers can impede their ability to achieve success in the field (St-Jean and Jacquemin, 2022; Halilem et al , 2022). Discriminatory experiences at the workplace can also discourage women from engaging in entrepreneurial activities (Reyes and Neergaard, 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These social beliefs often place stronger limitations on women’s access to the necessary resources for entrepreneurship than on men’s access to the same resources. Second, cultural and institutional barriers may discourage women from choosing entrepreneurship as a career path, as these barriers can impede their ability to achieve success in the field (St-Jean and Jacquemin, 2022; Halilem et al , 2022). Discriminatory experiences at the workplace can also discourage women from engaging in entrepreneurial activities (Reyes and Neergaard, 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also the introduction and development of new products or services (innovations) that combines implementation of scientific research into economic practice (Kirchberger, Pohl, 2016;Zhao, 2007;Mitchell, Singh, 1996;Dorf, Worthington, 1987). Some definitions also refer to the added value generated by the commercialisation process (OECD, 2013; Viale, Etzkowitz, 2010) and its effects (patents, licenses, spin-off formation, other collaborative activities) (Halilem et al, 2022;Caerteling et al, 2008). Considering the above, the following definition was formulated: Science commercialisation is a process, in which scientific effects provided in the framework of university-business cooperation becomes the subject of market trading, and thus contribute to the added value generation for society and economy.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, firms can vicariously learn by engaging academics as board members and advisors and through contract research and capacity-building training. These mechanisms enrich our understanding of business school academics' knowledge transfer, and previous studies have primarily focused on consultancy services and expert advice to firms (Amara, Halilem, and Traoré 2016;Halilem, De Silva, and Amara 2022;Wright et al 2009).…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This shortcoming is profound in economic settings with weak structures for knowledge transfer from the higher education sector to society and firms (Nsanzumuhire and Groot 2020;Zavale and Langa 2018). Therefore, there is a need to understand business school academics' transfer of knowledge to firms (Amara, Halilem, and Traoré 2016;Goethner and Wyrwich 2020;Halilem, De Silva, and Amara 2022) in contrast to much empirical evidence on academics in the applied sciences and engineering disciplines (Perkmann et al 2013(Perkmann et al , 2021.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%