Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3397271.3401051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fairness-Aware Explainable Recommendation over Knowledge Graphs

Abstract: There has been growing attention on fairness considerations recently, especially in the context of intelligent decision making systems. Explainable recommendation systems, in particular, may suffer from both explanation bias and performance disparity. In this paper, we analyze different groups of users according to their level of activity, and find that bias exists in recommendation performance between different groups. We show that inactive users may be more susceptible to receiving unsatisfactory recommendat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
84
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ge et al [16] explore long-term fairness in recommendation and accomplish the problem through dynamic fairness learning. Fu et al [15] propose a fairness constrained approach to mitigate the unfairness problem in the context of explainable recommendation over knowledge graphs. They find that performance bias exists between different user groups, and claim that such bias comes from the different distribution of path diversity.…”
Section: Fair Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ge et al [16] explore long-term fairness in recommendation and accomplish the problem through dynamic fairness learning. Fu et al [15] propose a fairness constrained approach to mitigate the unfairness problem in the context of explainable recommendation over knowledge graphs. They find that performance bias exists between different user groups, and claim that such bias comes from the different distribution of path diversity.…”
Section: Fair Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interpretability: The most common view of interpretability in RS is to increase the transparency of algorithms [14], [15], [40], [43], [164], which is especially important in health RS. Reliable explanations can greatly improve end-users' confidence in the recommendation results [126].…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [27] combined a gradient boosting decision tree with an attention mechanism to obtain an explainable recommendation system. In addition, the popular Knowledge Graph has been applied to various explainable recommendation systems [28]- [30].…”
Section: B Explainability Of Recommendation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%