2012
DOI: 10.1111/ijsa.12005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fairness Perceptions of Video Resumes among Ethnically Diverse Applicants

Abstract: This study investigated ethnic majority and minority applicants' fairness perceptions (N = 445) of video resumes, compared with paper resumes. Additionally, the moderating effect of minorities' ethnic identity and language proficiency on fairness perceptions of video/paper resumes was studied. Despite discriminatory concerns, ethnic minority applicants perceived the fairness of video resumes equally or more positively when compared with ethnic majority applicants, and when compared with paper resumes. Minoriti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Correspondence tests are unobtrusive measures and hence powerful methods to register labor market discrimination, but somewhat limited in that they only record callbacks and do not provide further insight as to why. Also, recruiters screened ‘paper people.’ This has been criticized, but is what recruiters most often do when they initially screen ‘real’ applicants either by means of paper résumés or video résumés (e.g., Hiemstra, Derous, Serlie, & Born, ). Whereas previous studies mainly tested students we investigated real recruiters, thereby enhancing the ecological validity of our study findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correspondence tests are unobtrusive measures and hence powerful methods to register labor market discrimination, but somewhat limited in that they only record callbacks and do not provide further insight as to why. Also, recruiters screened ‘paper people.’ This has been criticized, but is what recruiters most often do when they initially screen ‘real’ applicants either by means of paper résumés or video résumés (e.g., Hiemstra, Derous, Serlie, & Born, ). Whereas previous studies mainly tested students we investigated real recruiters, thereby enhancing the ecological validity of our study findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of research conducted in the Netherlands demonstrate substantive evidence for discrimination toward applicants of Arab origin (e.g., Derous, Nguyen, & Ryan, ; Derous, Ryan, & Nguyen, ; Hiemstra, Derous, Serlie, & Born, ). For instance, Derous and Ryan () illustrated that the rejection rate was 4.86 times higher for applicants bearing an Arab name than for Dutch.…”
Section: Discrimination Due To Ethnicity and Gender: How Susceptible mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Research conducted in the Netherlands with a sample of 445 unemployed job applicants has demonstrated that video-based resumes appear to have some benefits regarding applicant perceptions as they are considered by applicants (regardless of their ethnicity) to be fairer than traditional, paper-based resumes (Hiemstra, Derous, Serlie, & Born, 2012). However, laboratory research using an undergraduate sample suggested that evaluations of applied social skills and mental capabilities of applicants were lower when those evaluations were based solely on video resumes as opposed to when those evaluations were based solely on paper resumes (Waung, Hymes, & Beatty, 2014).…”
Section: Overall Resume Formatmentioning
confidence: 99%