Faith, Generosity, Knowledge and the Buddhist Gift: Moral Discourses on Chinese Patronage of Tibetan Buddhist Monasteries

Abstract

Chinese imperial patronage of Tibetan Buddhism has a long history. However, in recent years, increasing numbers of private Chinese individuals have been making gifts to Tibetan Buddhist monasteries and monks. There is a growing body of scholarship examining reasons for the increasing interest in Tibetan Buddhism. However, there has been little discussion of how Chinese patronage is perceived 'back home' in the monasteries receiving gifts and their local supporting communities. Scholars have argued that Sino-Tibetan patronage relationships are based on a common understanding of religious sponsorship and operate relatively smoothly. However, as this paper shows, this is not how many local people see them. The insertion of Chinese patronage into the complex local field of religious giving can be delicate and even dangerous for monastics. Examination of local moral discourses to see when and how Sino-Tibetan patronage breaks the 'rules of the game' suggests that there are values that underpin the ethics of both Buddhist gifts and remunerations for religious services, despite their conceptual distinction in emic understandings. In particular, the category of faith (dad pa) and its relationship to generosity and knowledge are central to the ethics and efficacy of religious giving to monastics, while the virtue of unsolicited giving is of particular importance for monastic recipients of wealth and goods from the laity.Faith, Generosity, Knowledge and the Gift 465

Idioms of Dignity and Respect: Addressing Elderly Strangers in Buddhist Monastic Publics in Reformed China

“…Interactions within these spaces tend to be spontaneous and unstructured, unlike the more institutionalized laymonastic exchanges of Tibetan or Theravada Buddhist societies (cf. Spiro 1982;Tambiah 1970Tambiah , 1982Caple 2015Caple , 2017. Socio-politically, the Han temple-going public does not automatically adopt roles of discipleship or patronage toward resident monastics, nor do they necessarily recognize each other as fellow co-religionists, leading to a spectrum of interactions from deferential exchanges to more egalitarian encounters, all within shared ritual spaces.…”

The wheel-turning king and the lucky lottery: perspectives new and old on wealth and merriment within Buddhism

“…Epigraphic sources, both past and present, demonstrate the importance of Buddhist donations and their associations with conviviality. By investigating an ethnographic example in the light of historical sources we contribute to contemporary research that investigates Buddhist and non-Buddhist practices of dāna (Abrahms-Kavunenko 2015; Bowie 1998;Brac de la Perrière 2015;Caple 2015;Cook 2010;Gravers 2012;Fisher 2008;Laidlaw 2000;Parry 1986;Samuels 2007;Smyer Yü 2012). The activities in which we participated, by centralising donation and plenty at Buddhism's most important pilgrimage site, represent an attempt to mobilise the centripetal forces of the holy town to gain higher status for the donors within Buddhist hierarchies.…”

Compassion without pity: Buddhist dāna as charity, humanitarianism, and altruism

“…454–455; Simpson, 2004, p. 842)—or whether reciprocal benefits are present but intangible or “unseen” (Fisher, 2014, p. 123; see also Chaisinthop, 2014, p. 397). For further perspectives on this debate, see Bornstein, 2012 p. 14–15; Caple (2015), Carstens (2018), Eck (2013), Heim (2004), Sihlé (2015), Spiro (1970), and Tambiah (1968).…”