2002
DOI: 10.1126/science.295.5553.297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faithful Expression of Imprinted Genes in Cloned Mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

10
153
3
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 260 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
10
153
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Defects in the trans-acting machinery that regulates imprinting, such as DNA methyltransferase deficiency (Lei et al, 1996;Bourc'his et al, 2001;Hata et al, 2002;Kaneda et al, 2004;Arima et al, 2006) or mutations causing familial hydatidiform moles (Judson et al, 2002;Murdoch et al, 2006) result in abnormal placentation. Finally, interspecific hybrids (Vrana et al, 1998;Vrana et al, 2000), somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos (Dindot et al, 2004;Inoue et al, 2002) and uniparental embryos (Surani et al, 1986;Varmuza et al, 1993;Mann 2005) all suffer from dysmorphic trophoblast, in part or in whole because of abnormal expression of imprinted genes.…”
Section: Sfmbt2 and Yy1 Interact In Mammalian Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defects in the trans-acting machinery that regulates imprinting, such as DNA methyltransferase deficiency (Lei et al, 1996;Bourc'his et al, 2001;Hata et al, 2002;Kaneda et al, 2004;Arima et al, 2006) or mutations causing familial hydatidiform moles (Judson et al, 2002;Murdoch et al, 2006) result in abnormal placentation. Finally, interspecific hybrids (Vrana et al, 1998;Vrana et al, 2000), somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos (Dindot et al, 2004;Inoue et al, 2002) and uniparental embryos (Surani et al, 1986;Varmuza et al, 1993;Mann 2005) all suffer from dysmorphic trophoblast, in part or in whole because of abnormal expression of imprinted genes.…”
Section: Sfmbt2 and Yy1 Interact In Mammalian Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transcription in transplanted nucleus ceases during the process [4,13] and resumes several hours after PPN formation [14]. There is accumulating evidence that reprogramming in transcription profile [15] and epigenetic marks [7][8][9][10][11][12] is incomplete in the majority of cloned embryos. A large proportion of them display ectopic gene expression and aberrant covalent modifications that are correlated with the donor cell type [7][8][9][10][11][12]15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cloned embryos and animals, X-chromosome inactivation is reversed [5] and telomeres are extended [6]. Patterns in DNA methylation and histone modification are also reprogrammed, although such reprogramming is not efficient [7][8][9][10][11][12]. Transcription in transplanted nucleus ceases during the process [4,13] and resumes several hours after PPN formation [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Epigenetic studies revealed mostly normal X-chromosome inactivation Wrenzycki et al 2002) but showed methylation instability at specific CpG islands in cloned mouse embryos obtained from somatic (Ohgane et al 2001) and embryonic stem (ES) cells (Humpherys et al 2001). Studies on epigenetic changes have also been conducted on the small proportion of clones that become fetuses or develop to term, indicating that imprinting is largely normal or that mammalian development is tolerant of epigenetic aberrations (Humpherys et al 2001;Inoue et al 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%