Faithfulness and Identity in Prosodic Morphology

McCarthy, John J.; Prince, Alan

doi:10.1002/9780470756171.ch3

Cited by 178 publications

(143 citation statements)

References 48 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

114

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Rangée plus haut que LAZY C'+j, *CODA va bloquer son application; rangée plus bas, elle va la permettre. Nous supposons que la variation des formes de C+j+V est générée par la combinaison des contraintes sur la structure syllabique (*CODA) et la complexité articulatoire LAZY C'+j, qui interagissent avec la contrainte de conformité MAX IO (MacCarthy et Prince 1995), qui préserve des segments de l'effacement.…”

Section: Contraintesunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Gémination de surface dans des dialectes biélorusses et russes

Kaminskaïa

2004

rql

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

La géométrie des traits, l’approche autosegmentale et la phonologie articulatoire, de même que la théorie de l’optimalité permettent de rendre compte de certaines différences dialectales dans des parlers biélorusses et russes. Les variables étudiées sont les formes du groupe étymologique consonne + jod + voyelle, qui peuvent contenir une consonne palatalisée, simple ou géminée. Parmi les problèmes soulevés par les données, on trouve la gémination de surface, le rapport entre la palatalisation et la gémination, la raison de la variation des formes de C + j + V et leurs possibilités de combinaison limitées.Feature Geometry together with an Autosegmental approach, Articulatory Phonology, and OT allow us to account for some dialectal differences between varieties of Byelorussian and Russian. The variables studied here are the forms of etymological combination consonant + jod + vowel that include a simple or geminate palatalized consonant. The data raise such questions as how to account for surface geminates, how palatalization and gemination are related, why C + j + V varies in its forms, and why these forms can coexist in limited combinations

show abstract

Section: Contraintesunclassified

“…(MacCarthy et Prince 1995) Il est évident que la forme C' transgresse cette contrainte. Par contre, la forme avec la consonne géminée ne le fait pas, parce que dans C'C', le /j/ de l'input n'est pas perdu, mais assimilé à la consonne précédente.…”

Section: Contraintesunclassified

Gémination de surface dans des dialectes biélorusses et russes

Kaminskaïa

2004

rql

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Section 2 briefly presents reduplication in Diyari to illustrate the Prosodic Hierarchy-based theory of minimality. Section 3 presents McCarthy and Prince's ( , 1995 analysis of Axininca Campa reduplication, and shows that it in fact contradicts the central claim and predictions of the Prosodic Hierarchy-based theory of minimality. Section 4 develops an alternative theory of minimality, and illustrates it with a reanalysis of Axininca Campa reduplication.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Morphological Complexity and Prosodic Minimality

Downing¹

2005

catjl

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It is widely attested, cross-linguistically, for both words and prosodic morphemes to be required to be minimally bimoraic or disyllabic. Work since McCarthy and Prince (1986) argues that these minimality effects fall out from the Prosodic Hierarchy. Requiring the relevant morpheme to be a Prosodic Word and dominate a stress Foot automatically also imposes a two mora or two syllable minimality requirement. In this paper I show, based on a reanalysis of reduplication in Axininca Campa, that this Prosodic Hierarchy-based theory of minimality is inadequate. I argue instead that morphological minimality conditions are better explained as a form of Head-Dependent Asymmetry (Dresher and van der Hulst 1998). Head morphemes are enhanced by requiring more complex prosodic structure, mirroring their more complex morphological structure. This alternative approach not only provides a uniform account of minimality effects holding for Axininca Campa reduplication, it also solves the problems raised by McCarthy and Prince's (1993, 1995) analysis of the data.Key words: compounds, head-dependent asymmetry, minimal word, minimality, onset, Optimality Theory, positional prominence, prosodic hierarchy, prosodic word, reduplication, stem; Axininca Campa, Diyari.* I would like to thank an anonymous reviewer, the editors of this volume as well as audiences at NYU, SUNY-Stony Brook, the 12 th Manchester Phonology Meeting, OCP2 in Tromsø, and the University of Barcelona for thought-provoking comments and questions on earlier versions of this work. Both the presentation and content of the analyses have been improved as a result of responding to these comments. Any errors of fact or interpretation are, of course, my responsibility.

show abstract

“…MAXLex, DEP-Lex, Linearity-Lex), expresses the cross-linguistic tendency for preservation of information contained in lexical words ather than in function words. It was proposed by Casali (1997) and Pulleyblank (1997) (under 'Faith-Stem' -see also Trubetzkoy 1939, Steriade 1995, Casali 1996and Beckman 1997, although implicit in McCarthy and Prince (1995) under the Root-Affix Faithfulness Metaconstraint: Root-Faith >> Affix-Faith. In the context of AWRA, FAITH-Lex predicts the directionality of AWRA, and thus prevents cases of progressive assimilation (e.g.…”

Section: Nocoda-rtmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rastreamento Ocular De Sintagmas Preposicionais Ambíguos Em Português

Maia

2017

RAbralin

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Este artigo apresenta resultados de um estudo de rastreamento ocular de frases contendo sintagmas preposicionais (SP) com função de adjunto ou de argumento de um verbo, que admitem aposição sintática ambígua ao sintagma verbal ou ao sintagma nominal objeto. Os resultados obtidos indicam que o processador sintático não faz uso imediato da informação lexical relativa ao estatuto do SP como adjunto ou argumento, acessando esta informação apenas na fase de reanálise, após a recuperação do efeito labirinto (garden-path).

show abstract

Faithfulness and Identity in Prosodic Morphology

Cited by 178 publications

References 48 publications

Gémination de surface dans des dialectes biélorusses et russes

Gémination de surface dans des dialectes biélorusses et russes

Morphological Complexity and Prosodic Minimality

Rastreamento Ocular De Sintagmas Preposicionais Ambíguos Em Português

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About