Fake News and Internet Shutdowns in Indonesia: Symptoms of Failure to Uphold Democracy

Abstract

The Indonesian government limited or shut down internet access during separate riots in Jakarta and Papua in 2019. The justification for blocking the internet and disabling certain features of social media platforms was to quell the unrest by ceasing the spread of fake news. Nevertheless, the government did not declare a state of emergency in response to either situation, triggering debate on whether the internet restrictions had any strong constitutional basis or if they were out of proportion and unconstitutional. This study evaluates the government’s policy on internet shutdowns to reduce the spread of fake news amid riots, and explicates when the state of emergency “feature” might be activated. The research method of this article is a doctrinal legal approach, which critically examines whether the government policy was excessive, and to what extent a state of emergency can be implemented by minimum standard requirements. The result of this study shows the riots in Jakarta and Papua ought not be categorized as national threats; hence, the internet shutdown was out of proportion. Fake news is part of the price we pay for a free society; thus the article argues that an internet shutdown is not a proper way to combat fakenews. Furthermore, the government has failed to fulfill the minimum standards to justify the internet shutdowns. Access to the internet is a new face of democratic pillars, so blocking internet access without any sufficient legal instruments and correct constitutional interpretation might indicate symptoms of a failure to uphold democracy.

Social media and crowdsourcing in disaster risk management: Trends, gaps, and insights from the current state of research

“…Moreover, different regions present distinct social, political, and cultural circumstances, giving rise to unique challenges and different research questions. For example, Rahman and Tang (2022) raise questions about the legitimacy and impact of internet restrictions imposed by the Indonesian government to reduce the spread of COVID‐19‐related misinformation, providing a case‐specific analysis of repressive policies in the context of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Wong et al (2021) illustrate the extent to which cultural factors can influence disaster communication strategies, by describing how the government successfully borrowed concepts from the celebrity fandom culture in China to implement a novel governance strategy during the pandemic.…”

Digital Rights and Mobile Health in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Protocol for a Scoping Review

“…Digital rights discourse often focuses on high-income countries in which, in most cases, users enjoy significant digital access and considerable rights and legal protections [16]. This work seeks to explore low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) instead, which are more at risk of digital rights violations (eg, state-sanctioned internet shutdowns and internet-based censorship) [17][18][19] and where user rights are inadequately regulated [20,21].…”

Digital rights and mobile health in Southeast Asia: A scoping review

“…3 , 5 , 14 Internet access as a right is a well-explored topic in the literature, especially in research addressing low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) which experience a high risk of regular digital rights violations due to restrictive policies that impose, for instance, internet shutdowns and online content censorship. 15 – 17 It is typical for ‘online’ to be conflated with ‘digital’ in discussions about digital rights, leading to the common perception that digital rights are exclusively centered on the internet. 18 However, digital rights also concern data justice, communication rights, labor rights, privacy, democratization issues, and so on.…”