2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3462933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fake (Sybil) Account Detection Using Machine Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Social bots and their effects have been studied in the context of political manipulation and misinformation, such as for presidential campaigns (Shao et al, 2017), distorting online discussion in presidential election (Bessi & Ferrara, 2016), influencing public opinion (Ross et al, 2019) or fabricating collective action (Francois et al, 2018). The majority of analysis and computational work on social bots have been mostly concentrated on how to detect bot accounts (Cao et al, 2012;Chavoshi et al, 2016;Chu et al, 2012;Davis et al, 2016;Luo et al, 2020;Mazza et al, 2019;Singh, & Banerjee, 2019;Wang et al, 2012) as discussed in detail in Chapter…”
Section: Chapter Five: Affordances and Social Botsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social bots and their effects have been studied in the context of political manipulation and misinformation, such as for presidential campaigns (Shao et al, 2017), distorting online discussion in presidential election (Bessi & Ferrara, 2016), influencing public opinion (Ross et al, 2019) or fabricating collective action (Francois et al, 2018). The majority of analysis and computational work on social bots have been mostly concentrated on how to detect bot accounts (Cao et al, 2012;Chavoshi et al, 2016;Chu et al, 2012;Davis et al, 2016;Luo et al, 2020;Mazza et al, 2019;Singh, & Banerjee, 2019;Wang et al, 2012) as discussed in detail in Chapter…”
Section: Chapter Five: Affordances and Social Botsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social bots and their effects have been studied in the context of political manipulation and misinformation, such as for presidential campaigns (Shao et al, 2017), distorting online discussion in presidential election (Bessi & Ferrara, 2016), influencing public opinion (Ross et al, 2019) or fabricating collective action (Francois et al, 2018). The majority of analysis and computational work on social bots have been mostly concentrated on how to detect bot accounts (Cao et al, 2012;Chavoshi et al, 2016;Chu et al, 2012;Davis et al, 2016;Luo et al, 2020;Mazza et al, 2019;Singh, & Banerjee, 2019;Wang et al, 2012) as discussed in detail in Chapter…”
Section: Chapter Five: Affordances and Social Botsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ese accounts are counterfeit accounts injected in the OSNs to spread fake news, compromise systems, or make Sybil attacks. us, with the increasing popularity of the OSNs, the fake accounts are increasing, reaching up to 3 to 4% of Facebook accounts [5]. e Sybil attacks are discussed in [5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Fake Accountsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With over 320 million active users, Twitter has become one of the most popular microblogging OSNs [5]. Unfortunately, there is not any publicly available standardized Twitter dataset for authorship verification studies [3].…”
Section: Collecting and Preprocessing The Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation