2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.11.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faking and forcing trust: The performance of trust and distrust in public policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, participants in our study spoke about the need for honest individuals within the team, so as to allow for the development of trusted relationship with stakeholders. While trust between scientists and decision-makers is often considered as a critical precondition for enhancing the impact of science on policy and practice [ 74 ], the exact mechanisms by which trust is formed, maintained and broken in science-policy-practice networks is largely unknown [ 75 76 ]. Furthermore, it has also been suggested that too much trust among scientists and decision-makers can lead to adverse environmental outcomes, as well as to reputational damage to individuals and organisations [ 77 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, participants in our study spoke about the need for honest individuals within the team, so as to allow for the development of trusted relationship with stakeholders. While trust between scientists and decision-makers is often considered as a critical precondition for enhancing the impact of science on policy and practice [ 74 ], the exact mechanisms by which trust is formed, maintained and broken in science-policy-practice networks is largely unknown [ 75 76 ]. Furthermore, it has also been suggested that too much trust among scientists and decision-makers can lead to adverse environmental outcomes, as well as to reputational damage to individuals and organisations [ 77 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interdependencies between actors influence how particular actors can and will act, the forms of cooperation, and the way in which actors deal with conflicting ideas or interests. Here, trust is seen as vital to overcome conflicts and smooth the process between interdependent actors (de Vries et al, 2014). Secondly, the interdependencies between actors and institutions require attention.…”
Section: Fig 1 Illustration Of How a Governance Path Is Formed By Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Take for instance, the case of the so-called Peat Colonies in the north-east of the Netherlands: stories that stressed the poverty and lack of opportunity in that region demotivated entrepreneurs to start a business in that region which consequently led to a lack of entrepreneurial spirit in that region (Van Assche et al, 2012). De Vries et al (2014) demonstrate in their study focused on interactions between government officials concerning the Investment Fund for Rural Areas (ILG) that stories about distrust can truly create an atmosphere of distrust in reality: 'The feeling of distrust became the dominant story of the ILG on which people based their actions; the distrust became performative. These actions included the design of detailed agreements, the complex monitoring and control system, and the termination of the sharing of sensitive information' (de Vries et al, 2014: 287).…”
Section: The Concept Of Performativity In Planning and Public Adminismentioning
confidence: 99%