2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00103-014-2023-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Falldefinitionen für die Surveillance meldepflichtiger Infektionskrankheiten in Deutschland, Ausgabe 2015

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The case definition was strict concerning time, place and person, which allowed us to rely on unspecific symptoms such as fever without laboratory confirmation. This approach is compatible with the surveillance case definition according to the German infectious disease law, in which leptospirosis cases are defined based on the occurrence of clinical symptoms in conjunction with contact to or joint exposure with laboratory-confirmed patients (Diercke et al, 2014;Höhl, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The case definition was strict concerning time, place and person, which allowed us to rely on unspecific symptoms such as fever without laboratory confirmation. This approach is compatible with the surveillance case definition according to the German infectious disease law, in which leptospirosis cases are defined based on the occurrence of clinical symptoms in conjunction with contact to or joint exposure with laboratory-confirmed patients (Diercke et al, 2014;Höhl, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…For systematic data analysis, we defined cases according to the German surveillance case definition (Diercke et al, 2014) which is almost identical to the European case definitions (The European Commission, 2018). They include laboratory-confirmed cases as confirmed cases and clinical cases with epidemiological link to laboratory-confirmed cases as probable cases.…”
Section: Case Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, our results also suggest that many hepatitis B cases considered relevant for disease burden may have already been notified to LHDs, although not required by the notification law, and thus can be used for estimation of disease incidence and epidemiological analyses. In 2015 an update of the German case and reference definitions has been published that requires that hepatitis B cases without symptoms of acute hepatitis are included in the calculation of diseases incidences (they meet the reference definition) [20]. Additionally, in 2017 the notification requirements were changed so that laboratories have to notify every case of hepatitis B or C they detect regardless of clinical symptoms and course of disease (acute or chronic).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%