2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3908(03)00049-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

False interaction of syntaxin 1A with a Ca2+-activated K+ channel revealed by co-immunoprecipitation and pull-down assays: implications for identification of protein–protein interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
19
2
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, immunoprecipitation with the Flag-tagged SYP111 did not yield a band detected by the anti-Myc antibody, although both extracts included similar levels of the epitope-tagged SNARE and KC1 proteins. Included in the protein gel blot analysis shown, the right-most lanes are of total protein precipitated from the final washes prior to elution, confirming the absence of nonspecific retention of the epitopes on the resin (Fletcher et al, 2003).…”
Section: Online)mentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By contrast, immunoprecipitation with the Flag-tagged SYP111 did not yield a band detected by the anti-Myc antibody, although both extracts included similar levels of the epitope-tagged SNARE and KC1 proteins. Included in the protein gel blot analysis shown, the right-most lanes are of total protein precipitated from the final washes prior to elution, confirming the absence of nonspecific retention of the epitopes on the resin (Fletcher et al, 2003).…”
Section: Online)mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…This selectivity was evident in split-ubiquitin assays with yeast, in coimmunoprecipitation experiments after heterologous expression, and on expression as BiFC fusion constructs in Arabidopsis (Figures 1 and 2). Considered individually, each of these methods raises certain caveats with its application, whether in relation to non-native (heterologous) expression or to constitutive overexpression in vivo (Fletcher et al, 2003;Walter et al, 2004;Grefen et al, 2009). However, their common consensus in this singular result, and the lack of similar interactions among the closely related proteins tested in parallel, finds explanation only in the unique association between SYP121 and KC1.…”
Section: Syp121-kc1 Interaction Contributes To a Tripartite K + Channmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both co-IP studies, it was ␣ 1C that was precipitated with RyR1. However, co-IP experiments must be interpreted with care because false positives are possible (Fletcher et al, 2003). Finally, RyRs have been observed to interact functionally with DHPRs in excised membrane patches of cerebellar granule cells (Chavis et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The H3 a-helix also binds the CFTR Cl 2 channel (Naren et al, 1997;Ganeshan et al, 2003), although the association with vesicle fusion and possible roles for this interaction are less obvious. One difficulty in each of these examples rests with the amphipathic properties of the Q a -SNARE H3 a-helix: its seemingly promiscuous capacity for protein interaction has raised concerns about interpreting the physiological significance of SNARE binding with the channel proteins (Fletcher et al, 2003). It remains an unprecedented feature of SYP121, therefore, that its binding with KC1 depends not on the H3 or membrane-spanning a-helices, but on a previously unidentified motif isolated at the cytosolic N terminus of the SNARE and unique to SYP121.…”
Section: A Unique N-terminal Domain With Overlapping Functions?mentioning
confidence: 99%