False memory and COVID-19: How people fall for fake news about COVID-19 in digital contexts

Abstract

People are often exposed to fake news. Such an exposure to misleading information might lead to false memory creation. We examined whether people can form false memories for COVID-19-related fake news. Furthermore, we investigated which individual factors might predict false memory formation for fake news. In two experiments, we provided participants with two pieces of COVID-19-related fake news along with a non-probative photograph. In Experiment 1, 41% (n = 66/161) of our sample reported at least one false memory for COVID-19-related fake news. In Experiment 2, even a higher percentage emerged (54.9%; n = 185/337). Moreover, in Experiment 2, participants with conspiracy beliefs were more likely to report false memories for fake news than those without such beliefs, irrespective of the conspiratorial nature of the materials. Finally, while well-being was found to be positively associated with both true and false memories (Experiment 1), only analytical thinking was negatively linked to the vulnerability to form false memories for COVID-19-related fake news (Experiment 2). Overall, our data demonstrated that false memories can occur following exposure to fake news about COVID-19, and that governmental and social media interventions are needed to increase individuals’ discriminability between true and false COVID-19-related news.

Examining the association between social media fatigue, cognitive ability, narcissism and misinformation sharing: cross-national evidence from eight countries

“…The test has also been used in studies examining the association between cognitive ability and misinformation engagement 19,52 . Additionally, the wordsum test has been tested across diverse international samples from countries such as Belgium, Kenya, Nigeria, Singapore, and South Africa [ [57][58][59].…”

Fake news and false memory formation in the psychology debate

“…The participants ( N = 326) were psychology students and graduates of argentine universities. The sample size was decided according to previous studies sharing similar designs ( Mangiulli et al, 2022 , Lee et al, 2020 ) They were recruited through advertisements on social networks. Prior to their participation, they read and agreed to the informed consent approved by the Alberto Taquini Biomedical Research Ethics Committee.…”