1997
DOI: 10.1007/s003300050281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

False-negative MR imaging of malignant breast tumors

Abstract: Abstract. In this study we analyze MR-negative ma lignant lesions of the breast. A total of 204 patients with palpable and/or mammographie lesions were studied. The MR technique consisted of the turbo FLASH and MP-RAGE subtraction techniques. All patients underwent surgical biopsy and/or mastecto my and all specimens were examined by the correla tive radiologic-histologic mapping technique, A total of 208 lesions were evaluated; 145 turned out to be malignant and 63 proved to be benign. Six malignant lesions w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
70
2
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
70
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Orel et al (31) stated that the sensitivity of MRI was 77% in DCIS diagnosis, and Fischer et al (12) indicated that the histopathological diagnosis was DCIS in 29 of 30 false negative lesions. Furthermore, Boetes et al (32) reported that among 204 cases, analysis of the malignant tumors that were not detected in the MRI revealed that the false negative rate for the existence of DCIS was 23%; the majority of these occult lesions were DCIS. The sensitivity of MRI in DCIS diagnosis is reported to vary between 40% and 100% (3,31,32).…”
Section: B C Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Orel et al (31) stated that the sensitivity of MRI was 77% in DCIS diagnosis, and Fischer et al (12) indicated that the histopathological diagnosis was DCIS in 29 of 30 false negative lesions. Furthermore, Boetes et al (32) reported that among 204 cases, analysis of the malignant tumors that were not detected in the MRI revealed that the false negative rate for the existence of DCIS was 23%; the majority of these occult lesions were DCIS. The sensitivity of MRI in DCIS diagnosis is reported to vary between 40% and 100% (3,31,32).…”
Section: B C Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Boetes et al (32) reported that among 204 cases, analysis of the malignant tumors that were not detected in the MRI revealed that the false negative rate for the existence of DCIS was 23%; the majority of these occult lesions were DCIS. The sensitivity of MRI in DCIS diagnosis is reported to vary between 40% and 100% (3,31,32). The reasons that have been noted for false negativity include the lesion size, the variable histological characteristics of DCIS, and the degree of tumor angiogenesis (31).…”
Section: B C Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Balu-Maestro et al (6) found that ultrasound and mammography detected a smaller fraction of the cases of multifocal tumors than MRi. one caveat when using MRi to detect and monitor breast tumors is that, even though the method has a high sensitivity (95%-97%), it has a poor specificity (30%-97% depending on the series) (12,28), making it necessary that a suspect lesion be proven by guided biopsies.…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pathophysiology of DCIS may explain its features on MRI. 23,24 Unlike a mammography, which detects calcification due to necrosis in DCIS, MRI identifies altered perfusion due to angiogenesis and neovascularization. DCIS features on MRI are often subtle, compared with those of invasive cancer, with a common finding of asymmetric enhancement patterns.…”
Section: Detection Of Additional Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%