1992
DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1992.32192116439.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

False‐negative results by polymerase chain reaction due to contamination by glove powder

Abstract: The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique has become an important, widely employed method for the detection and quantitation of the nucleic acid sequences used in the diagnosis and monitoring of genetic and infectious diseases. Much attention has been directed at the problem of false-positive PCR results, which are generally attributed to low-level laboratory contamination of amplified sequences ("carryover"). In contrast, few investigators have commented on the somewhat less frequent, but equally problema… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ability to detect phage DNA was not obviously hindered by the presence of glove powder, as data for powdered and nonpowdered gloves among the gloves evaluated were comparable (Table 1), an important finding given the current prevalence of powdered gloves in use. There is at least one report that glove powder can inhibit PCR (4). In that study powder from a laboratory worker's gloves evidently entered PCR tubes during handling and subsequently inhibited DNA amplification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to detect phage DNA was not obviously hindered by the presence of glove powder, as data for powdered and nonpowdered gloves among the gloves evaluated were comparable (Table 1), an important finding given the current prevalence of powdered gloves in use. There is at least one report that glove powder can inhibit PCR (4). In that study powder from a laboratory worker's gloves evidently entered PCR tubes during handling and subsequently inhibited DNA amplification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Powder contamination from powdered gloves may give rise to sporadic false-negative PCR reactions (49 ).…”
Section: Document If Blood Taken From IV Linementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not all of the analysed cDNA samples showed unexpected transcripts. This could be due to unoptimized RT-PCR conditions without a nested strategy to enhance yield and specificity (Aittomaki et al, 1995;Roberts et al, 1993), a low RT-PCR cDNA input, and the low sensitivity of the ethidium bromide staining or other less frequent reasons for false-negative PCR results (de Lomas et al, 1992). Furthermore, genomic DNA contamination which can never be completely eliminated could compete for primers and dNTPs giving a negative result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%