2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2012.01.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

False-positive and false-negative sentinel node findings in 473 breast cancers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In another study from our institute, the breast pathologists re-analysed the SNs histopathological findings from a part of the present patient population, and found only a very low rate of false-positive ITC findings. 32 Most of the patients with ITC-positive cancer underwent a completion ALND, and patients with micrometastases or macrometastases in the non-sentinel nodes could be excluded from the study. Therefore, the ITC-positive patients in this study truly had pN0i+ cancer, a patient population that may currently be difficult to identify, since at present patients with ITC-positive cancer often do not undergo ALND.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study from our institute, the breast pathologists re-analysed the SNs histopathological findings from a part of the present patient population, and found only a very low rate of false-positive ITC findings. 32 Most of the patients with ITC-positive cancer underwent a completion ALND, and patients with micrometastases or macrometastases in the non-sentinel nodes could be excluded from the study. Therefore, the ITC-positive patients in this study truly had pN0i+ cancer, a patient population that may currently be difficult to identify, since at present patients with ITC-positive cancer often do not undergo ALND.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%