2012
DOI: 10.3343/alm.2012.32.2.167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

False-positive Urine Pregnancy Test Due to Leukocyte Interference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The explanation for the different results observed in the study by Jao et al [1] and the current study are unclear. Jao et al [1] do not describe the source of their WBC preparation, it is unknown if it is from one patient or multiple patients, and the WBC differential is also unknown.…”
contrasting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The explanation for the different results observed in the study by Jao et al [1] and the current study are unclear. Jao et al [1] do not describe the source of their WBC preparation, it is unknown if it is from one patient or multiple patients, and the WBC differential is also unknown.…”
contrasting
confidence: 92%
“…We observed that most of our false positive specimens were in patients with evidence of urinary tract infection (UTI) and pyuria; with this information, and in the context of the findings by Jao et al [1] that WBCs may result in false positive hCG assays, we evaluated the effect of WBCs or bacteria in urine on the analytical performance characteristics of both devices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations