2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FAMACHA© scores history of sheep characterized as resistant/resilient or susceptible to H. contortus in artificial infection challenge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the parasitic infection had a negative impact on PCV in lambs, considering the difference among phenotypic groups and the negative correlations between PCV and FEC. Other studies have found similar results, with higher PCV values in resistant lambs, and negative correlations between this blood parameter and FEC ( Amarante et al, 2009 , Zaros et al, 2014 , Pereira et al, 2016 ; Gonçalves et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…In the present study, the parasitic infection had a negative impact on PCV in lambs, considering the difference among phenotypic groups and the negative correlations between PCV and FEC. Other studies have found similar results, with higher PCV values in resistant lambs, and negative correlations between this blood parameter and FEC ( Amarante et al, 2009 , Zaros et al, 2014 , Pereira et al, 2016 ; Gonçalves et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Body condition was evaluated by palpation of the lumbar area of the sheep to determine the musculature and fat layer present [17] using a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 represents a starving sheep/slender, while 5 represents a fat sheep [16]. The color of the mucosa was evaluated by the FAMACHA© method [18,19], which consists in comparing the observed color of the ocular conjunctiva with a reference scale printed on a card, whose values range from 1 to 5, where 1 represents a sheep with red mucosa (without anemia) and in optimal conditions, while 5 represents an anemic sheep [16]. The cleanliness of the wool was evaluated by direct observation of the presence of moisture and dirt in the areas covered with wool, except for the perianal region of the sheep [20,21].…”
Section: Animal Welfare Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…using McMaster Technique [23]. Body Weight (BW) [19] was also recorded at this instance. All samples were processed at the Animal Welfare and Parasitology Laboratory at The University of Caldas.…”
Section: Blood and Fecal Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be possible to breed for more resistant sheep, both through conventional methods such as crossing with more resistant breeds (Amarante et al, 1999;Li et al, 2001), selection of stock for breeding on the basis of phenotypic measures such as FEC (Woolaston, 1992), weight gain in the face of challenge or PCV/FAMACHA © score (Burke and Miller, 2008;Riley and Van Wyk, 2009;Pereira et al, 2016) or, more recently, through the identification of genetic markers of resistance to haemonchosis and the use of these for the selection of breeding animals (Estrada-Reyes et al, 2019;Haehling et al, 2020).…”
Section: Breeding Haemonchosis-resistant Sheepmentioning
confidence: 99%