1988
DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1988.00520310076020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Familial Progressive Vestibulocochlear Dysfunction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cardiovascular disease was a prominent additional finding in the family in the present study, as in a family described by Verhagen et al 21 The latter family was recently shown to have the present DFNA9/ COCH mutation 21 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cardiovascular disease was a prominent additional finding in the family in the present study, as in a family described by Verhagen et al 21 The latter family was recently shown to have the present DFNA9/ COCH mutation 21 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…One of them has previously been described by Verhagen et al 19 (family W98‐094). A Flemish family with the Pro51Ser mutation has recently been studied by Fransen et al, 20 who also found this mutation in two other previously described Dutch families 21‐23 . Only one American patient with DFNA9‐linked sensorineural hearing impairment had proven hypoactive labyrinths at age 49 years and inactive labyrinths at age 53 years (case IV‐3, kindred 2) 16 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Its typical histopathological features have been established in temporal bone studies 4,5 long before it was found to be linked to the DFNA9 locus on chromosome 14q12‐q13 6–8 and the responsible COCH gene was identified 7–11 . Similar to other DFNA types (for example, DFNA6), 1 some of the clinical reports on the phenotypical features of DFNA9/ COCH antedated the linkage reports 12–17 . The former reports included one on the family underlying the present report, 13 which is caused by a Pro51Ser mutation in the COCH gene 7 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The clinical characteristics of family 1,5 family 2,7 12 13 family 3,14 and families 4-76 11 have been described previously. Symptoms similar to those described were observed in families 8, 9, 11, and 12, as well as in the isolated patients 10, 13, 14, and 15.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%