2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00079.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Families and family study in international perspective

Abstract: Many changes are occurring in the world's families. Some observers feel that the changes are destructive, whereas others see them as leading to new opportunities and understanding. Issues in international family studies include regional limitations and the various aspects of doing research cross-culturally. Knowledge regarding certain categories of families, inheritance, and the social psychology of families is incomplete. There are, however, some universals and universal or worldwide changes, including moveme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet another possibility for the centrality of dyad is cultural. Most samples in this study were Caucasian living in the United States, who are generally individualistic (Adams, 2004; Coontz, 2003). Families with other ethnic heritage and cultural values may share information more willingly within the whole family.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet another possibility for the centrality of dyad is cultural. Most samples in this study were Caucasian living in the United States, who are generally individualistic (Adams, 2004; Coontz, 2003). Families with other ethnic heritage and cultural values may share information more willingly within the whole family.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, this does not necessarily imply that the impact of children is constant or of the same magnitude across cultures. For example, a cross-cultural perspective on family dynamics would suggest that what occurs in Western societies is not always typical of our species (Adams, 2004;Friedl, 1975;Goode, 1993;Quale, 1988). Indeed, the cross-cultural literature using the Individualism-Collectivism distinction generally indicates that there are cultural differences in the dynamics of paths of development of mating and parent-child relationships (Markus & Kitayama, 1991;Triandis, 1995).…”
Section: Cross-cultural Differences In the Impact Of Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Declines in marriage and fertility have been among the few broadly generalizeable patterns in family change recently identified by Adams (2004) and others. Such general patterns, however, mask substantial variation between subgroups within and between countries (Heuveline & Timberlake, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%