2008
DOI: 10.1142/s0219199708002892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Families of Holomorphic Bundles

Abstract: Abstract. The first goal of the article is to solve several fundamental problems in the theory of holomorphic bundles over non-algebraic manifolds: For instance we prove that stability and semi-stability are Zariski open properties in families when the Gauduchon degree map is a topological invariant, or when the parameter manifold is compact. Second we show that, for a generically stable family of bundles over a Kähler manifold, the Petersson-Weil form extends as a closed positive current on the whole paramete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following theorem is a generalization of a result by Teleman ([24, Theorem 1.4]) and answers a conjecture of his (Conjecture 2 in p. 544 of [24]) in an affirmative way for projective varieties.…”
Section: The Weil-petersson Currentsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The following theorem is a generalization of a result by Teleman ([24, Theorem 1.4]) and answers a conjecture of his (Conjecture 2 in p. 544 of [24]) in an affirmative way for projective varieties.…”
Section: The Weil-petersson Currentsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In particular, it possesses a compactification as an analytic space. Our main result states that for moduli of stable holomorphic vector bundles the Weil-Petersson form extends as a positive, closed current to a compactification, thus answering a conjecture of Andrei Teleman ( [24]) in the affirmative way. The extension property holds, whenever a given family of stable vector bundles on a Kähler manifold is the restriction of a coherent sheaf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…where C and C ′ are constants not depending on F with C ′ > 0, cf. [Tel08] 2.1 for a similar computation in the smooth case. This proves the second assertion.…”
Section: A Boundedness Criterionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…7.3.38]. A direct analytic proof for Kähler or Hermitian manifolds seems more dicult (for a partial result,[36, Thm. 3]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%