1993
DOI: 10.1177/0044118x93024004007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family and Religious Influences on Adolescent Substance Abuse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
45
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
6
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the path analyses showed that, while parental variables did have some direct effects on their children_s substance use, the parental influences were felt mainly indirectly through differential peer association. Again, these results are similar to the findings from previous studies in the United States (Bahr, Hawks, & Wang, 1993;Brown, Mounts, Lamborn, & Steinberg, 1993;Dishion et al, 1991;Elliott et al, 1985;Hoffman, 1993;Melby et al, 1993;Warr, 1993b;Simons et al, 2004). In addition, the parental and peer variables primarily identified with social learning theory generally had more substantial and statistically significant effects than the parental and peer variables primarily identified with social bonding theory.…”
Section: Conclusion Limitations and Implicationssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Moreover, the path analyses showed that, while parental variables did have some direct effects on their children_s substance use, the parental influences were felt mainly indirectly through differential peer association. Again, these results are similar to the findings from previous studies in the United States (Bahr, Hawks, & Wang, 1993;Brown, Mounts, Lamborn, & Steinberg, 1993;Dishion et al, 1991;Elliott et al, 1985;Hoffman, 1993;Melby et al, 1993;Warr, 1993b;Simons et al, 2004). In addition, the parental and peer variables primarily identified with social learning theory generally had more substantial and statistically significant effects than the parental and peer variables primarily identified with social bonding theory.…”
Section: Conclusion Limitations and Implicationssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…A weak negative correlation between level of religious commitment and alcohol use was the prototypical empirical finding, although there was some variability in the strength of the association depending on the manner in which religiosity was measured (eg, affiliation or frequency of attendance) and what other variables were included in prediction equations. For example, after including the variables of parental monitoring and family drug use, Bahr et al 114 reported that religious importance was not significantly associated with peer drug use or current adolescent substance use. Therefore, level of religiosity, by itself, may not be a consistent potent predictor of adolescent alcohol use.…”
Section: Religiositymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rollins and Thomas (1979) found that high parental control were associated with high achievement. Religiosity as an aspect of the family environment is another independent variable possibly influencing academic achievement (Bahr, Hawks, & Wang, 1993). Cassidy and Lynn (1991) explored how family environment impacts motivation and achievement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%