2014
DOI: 10.1177/0002716214524515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family Complexity among Children in the United States

Abstract: Researchers largely have relied on a measure of family structure to describe children’s living arrangements, but this approach captures only the child’s relationship to the parent(s), ignoring the presence and composition of siblings. We develop a measure of family complexity that merges family structure and sibling composition to distinguish between simple two-biological-parent families, families with complex-sibling (half or stepsiblings) arrangements, and complex-parent (stepparent, single-parent) families.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
70
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
70
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These directions may yield insight into key life-course concerns that influence both stability and change in children's lives (Fomby and Cherlin 2007;Sampson and Laub 1993). Research on the dynamics of sibling living arrangements would be consistent with Manning et al's research on family complexity in children's lives in other contexts (Manning et al 2014). These dynamic directions may further the understanding of family complexity in relation to mass imprisonment and its association with the well-being of highly-marginalized women and their families (Sykes and Pettit 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…These directions may yield insight into key life-course concerns that influence both stability and change in children's lives (Fomby and Cherlin 2007;Sampson and Laub 1993). Research on the dynamics of sibling living arrangements would be consistent with Manning et al's research on family complexity in children's lives in other contexts (Manning et al 2014). These dynamic directions may further the understanding of family complexity in relation to mass imprisonment and its association with the well-being of highly-marginalized women and their families (Sykes and Pettit 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…We found stable or declining shares of women with a child from a previous relationship. Associations were generally modest between our indicators of family complexity and union instability, in all suggesting a small role of family complexity in accounting for changes in union stability over time-smaller than we expected based on recent attention to family complexity and its potential link to the subsequent life course (e.g., Carlson and Furstenberg 2006;Guzzo and Furstenberg 2007a, b;Lichter and Qian 2008; but see Manning et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Yet another wrinkle emerges if the G1 generation has other children (minor or adult) living at home; these would be the G2 generation’s siblings and could represent a draw on household resources or a potential source of support. The emerging body of research on family complexity has largely looked at “horizontal” complexity (sibling ties) or two-generation complexity (stepparents and stepchildren) (Manning, Brown, & Stykes, 2014), but family complexity can also emerge – and be quite fluid – based on multigenerational ties and coresidence. Further, family structure instability has been associated with poorer outcomes for children (Cavanagh & Huston, 2008), and there is evidence that these multigenerational families were similarly unstable (Dunifon, Ziol-Guest, & Kopka, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%