2006
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-7-36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family doctors' knowledge and self-reported care of type 2 diabetes patients in comparison to the clinical practice guideline: cross-sectional study

Abstract: Background: It is widely believed that providing doctors with guidelines will lead to more effective clinical practice and better patient care. However, different studies have shown contradictory results in quality improvement as a result of guideline implementation. The aim of this study was to compare family doctors' knowledge and self-reported care of type 2 diabetes patients with recommendation standards of the clinical practice guideline. Methods:In April 2003 a survey was conducted among family doctors i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study revealed high selfreported compliance to this test by both physicians and nurses (79.0%) every 3 to 6 months. This finding is much better than other countries, such as Estonia and the USA (4,19), but very similar to general practitioners' practice in South Africa (17).…”
Section: Services Provided and Referral To Specialized Servicesmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This study revealed high selfreported compliance to this test by both physicians and nurses (79.0%) every 3 to 6 months. This finding is much better than other countries, such as Estonia and the USA (4,19), but very similar to general practitioners' practice in South Africa (17).…”
Section: Services Provided and Referral To Specialized Servicesmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The guidelines may directly or indirectly influence the care given by physicians to patients with diabetes (13). A number of studies have shown that the presence of guidelines is not a factor in determining physicians' knowledge and behaviour in the followup and treatment of diabetes patients and very few physicians report using them (4,6,14). Rätsep et al justified this by citing doubts held by some physicians about the guidelines, while others believed that the guidelines had been developed to save costs and not for the benefit of patients (4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Concerning secondary prevention of coronary heart disease, guideline knowledge led to improved cardiovascular risk factor treatment [16]. On the other hand, family doctors' knowledge and self-reported behaviour concerning treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus was not related to the reported availability or usage of the guideline in Estonia [17]. However the survey was relatively small and the authors admitted that the concerned type of health care (use of laboratory tests) might also depend on financial resources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%