2019
DOI: 10.1177/0165025419873037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family functioning patterns predict teenage girls’ sexting

Abstract: Online exchange of sexual content (“sexting”) is associated with potentially negative consequences, especially for girls. We investigated possible associations between family functioning and girls’ sexting. Italian teenage girls ( N = 250; Mage = 16.36 years; SDage = 1.88) completed online surveys that evaluated family functioning (communication, flexibility, cohesion, disengagement, chaos, enmeshment, and rigidity) and five sexting behaviors: (a) engaging in sexting, (b) sexting with a partner, (c) number of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An increasing amount of scholars consider sexting as a normal, even healthy aspect of sexual expression, and part of the repertoire of interpersonal sexual communication relationships (e.g., [ 15 , 20 , 21 ]). This kind of sexting, named experimental sexting, refers to consensual exchange of sexual content for addressing young peoples’ developmental tasks and needs, such as exploring their sexuality and identity [ 22 , 23 ]. Wolak, Finkelhor, and Mitchell [ 19 ] were the first to talk about the concept of experimental sexting, identifying sexting as a new sexual normative behavior related to sexual experimentation that is typical of adolescence and young adulthood, such as sharing own photos for receiving feedback about the adequacy of one’s own body image or for sexual experimentation [ 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increasing amount of scholars consider sexting as a normal, even healthy aspect of sexual expression, and part of the repertoire of interpersonal sexual communication relationships (e.g., [ 15 , 20 , 21 ]). This kind of sexting, named experimental sexting, refers to consensual exchange of sexual content for addressing young peoples’ developmental tasks and needs, such as exploring their sexuality and identity [ 22 , 23 ]. Wolak, Finkelhor, and Mitchell [ 19 ] were the first to talk about the concept of experimental sexting, identifying sexting as a new sexual normative behavior related to sexual experimentation that is typical of adolescence and young adulthood, such as sharing own photos for receiving feedback about the adequacy of one’s own body image or for sexual experimentation [ 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study suggests that positive parental monitoring and involvement in youths’ activities could have a protective effect on sexting perpetration, particularly among LGB adolescents. The effect of parental monitoring could be due to higher supervision of cellphone and internet use among more involved parents which could directly be associated with youths’ use of cellphones for sexting [ 71 ]. Additionally, this finding could be explained by higher adolescent-parent communication and a better family dynamic among LGB students with higher parental monitoring which would support the establishment of clear rules around sexting and other risky behaviors [ 70 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One large-scale cross-sectional study of Croatian adolescents found that parental monitoring significantly predicted levels of sexual experience, sexting, and self-reported sexual aggressiveness in both male and female adolescents (Tomić et al, 2018). Compatible findings were reported in an Italian study of female adolescents, where communication in the family strongly and negatively predicted participants' engaging in sexting (Bianchi, Morelli, Baiocco, Cattelino, et al, 2019).…”
Section: Parental and Peer Influencementioning
confidence: 96%