2016
DOI: 10.1080/20780389.2015.1114416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family, Gender, and Women's Nutritional Status: A Comparison Between Two Himalayan Communities in Nepal

Abstract: During the last decades, the focus of food and nutrition security research has shifted from issues of macro-level availability to problems of unequal access, and distribution within the household. Little systematic attention has however been paid to the role of family systems in household food allocation processes. This study focuses on the extent to which family relations, and particularly gender roles, in two Himalayan communities with different family systems influence intra-household food allocation, and t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
62
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Before childbearing, young married women had low status and were subtly discouraged from eating special foods like animal products and certain fried foods. Men’s higher status was “recognised in many ways, including household food behaviour”Allocation of ‘special’ foods Madjdian and Bras [40]2016In-depth interviews30 individualsTwo Himalayan communities from Humla district.Female respondents (15 Buddhist; 15 Hindu Dalit or Chhetri) of reproductive age (aged 15 to 49 years). Selected respondents who were pregnant or had been pregnant at least once before.Inductive coding based on a conceptual framework, using bottom-up and top-down coding to allow new themes to emerge.• Beliefs about ‘fair share’ / Religion - Buddhist households allocated food according to appetite; this was not reported in Hindu households.• Cultural beliefs and food habits - Certain foods believed to cause skin allergies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Before childbearing, young married women had low status and were subtly discouraged from eating special foods like animal products and certain fried foods. Men’s higher status was “recognised in many ways, including household food behaviour”Allocation of ‘special’ foods Madjdian and Bras [40]2016In-depth interviews30 individualsTwo Himalayan communities from Humla district.Female respondents (15 Buddhist; 15 Hindu Dalit or Chhetri) of reproductive age (aged 15 to 49 years). Selected respondents who were pregnant or had been pregnant at least once before.Inductive coding based on a conceptual framework, using bottom-up and top-down coding to allow new themes to emerge.• Beliefs about ‘fair share’ / Religion - Buddhist households allocated food according to appetite; this was not reported in Hindu households.• Cultural beliefs and food habits - Certain foods believed to cause skin allergies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An Indian study concluded that beliefs about fairness affected food allocation because the respondents were reluctant to discuss disparities in food allocation [51]. Abdullah [36] also indicated this, by reporting a respondent’s description of a mother-in-law as a “bad woman” (p112) if she did not give her daughter-in-law special foods that others received, and Madjdian and Bras reported that Buddhist households allocated food according to appetite [40]. Pitt et al reported that the tendency for households to equalise food allocation, rather than allocate food in an income-maximising way, was a reflection of households’ aversions to inequity [32].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is supported by a review of intrahousehold food allocation that shows that inequities are more likely in food insecure or poor households, although this also depends on other factors such as religion, household size, social status, and women's bargaining power . For instance, a study in the far west corner of Nepal showed that adolescent girls ended up second last, or last in case of daughters‐in‐law, in the household serving order, which could have influenced their nutritional status, especially in food insecure households . Unequal treatment may thus result when households face extreme circumstances, leading to discrimination against vulnerable women .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…142 For instance, a study in the far west corner of Nepal showed that adolescent girls ended up second last, or last in case of daughters-in-law, in the household serving order, which could have influenced their nutritional status, especially in food insecure households. 143 Unequal treatment may thus result when households face extreme circumstances, leading to discrimination against vulnerable women. 144 Regarding micronutrient deficiencies, the opposite effect was found.…”
Section: Age and Sexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nutrition is a fundamental pillar of human life, health, and development (1). Globally, 10% of women aged 20 to 49 suffer from underweight (2). The greatest burden of maternal undernutrition is seen in low income countries (3) where an estimated 450 million adult women are stunted (4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%