1963
DOI: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1963.00052.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family Group Therapy in Retrospect: Four Years and Sixty Families

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1964
1964
1979
1979

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[5, p. 1172] With regard to patient and treatment variables influencing deterioration and discontinuance in marital and family therapy, the available evidence (28,69,70,72) shows no relationship to severity or chronicity of the disorder alone, although certain therapist styles, described above, increase the chances of premature termination of very disturbed families. What passed for humanistic nonintervention therapy actually seemed to cover implicit acceptance of "lots of women are slapped around by their husbands in our society so it's nothing to be concerned with."…”
Section: What Factors Influence the Occurrence Of Deterioration?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5, p. 1172] With regard to patient and treatment variables influencing deterioration and discontinuance in marital and family therapy, the available evidence (28,69,70,72) shows no relationship to severity or chronicity of the disorder alone, although certain therapist styles, described above, increase the chances of premature termination of very disturbed families. What passed for humanistic nonintervention therapy actually seemed to cover implicit acceptance of "lots of women are slapped around by their husbands in our society so it's nothing to be concerned with."…”
Section: What Factors Influence the Occurrence Of Deterioration?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One could speculate that such factors as counter‐transference, lack of experience, and ambivalence of the therapist in dealing with markedly defensive and resistive family structures, play a role in determining whether families will receive therapy. Shellow et al (16) found, indeed, “a significant relationship between the experience therapists have (with CFT) and the rate of loss (of the family) after only one session.” These factors, of course, are usually not stated in the charts but can be inferred from phrases such as “Conflicting family.” Much of the speculation could be eliminated if the therapists reported more about their personal feelings towards the families. Unfortunately, the present habits of record keeping exclude comments about counter‐transference and the therapists' own practical difficulties, and not enough attention is paid to proper documentation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shellow et al . (16) imply this double natural selection in their statement “those (families) who are ‘allowed’ to continue treatment longest are those families which prove to be interesting to us because of their similarity to the therapist's own middle‐class situation.” Hollingshead et al . (9) have also made clear that “better” patients get better care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Shellow, Brown, and Osberg (22), in their retrospective study of sixty families treated in conjoint therapy, categorize the causes of drop-out according to the stated reason, for example: 'family sees sufficient improvement', 'family loses interest', 'father pulls out', 'mother pulls out'. It is quickly seen that this classification is superficial and naive.…”
Section: Family Resistancesmentioning
confidence: 99%