2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.01.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family history does not predict angiographic localization or severity of coronary artery disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No significant association is noted between family history and severity of CAD (p=0.12). Amvita banerjee et al 17 in their study concluded that sex-specific family history data do not predict angiographic localization of coronary disease in patients presenting with ACS. Smoking is found to be significantly associated with severe CAD (p<0.0001) and is very common in males in central India.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…No significant association is noted between family history and severity of CAD (p=0.12). Amvita banerjee et al 17 in their study concluded that sex-specific family history data do not predict angiographic localization of coronary disease in patients presenting with ACS. Smoking is found to be significantly associated with severe CAD (p<0.0001) and is very common in males in central India.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Overall, our results were somewhat consistent with the results of a study by Amitava et al, where they concluded that FH data do not predict angiographic localization of coronary disease in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Maternal stroke and maternal myocardial infarction may affect ACS in women by a mechanism unrelated to atherosclerosis or coronary anatomy ( 21 ). However, FH data may still be useful in the risk prediction and prognosis of ACS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reality is that, many researchers have shown discrepant results and many other researchers have concluded that many of the conventional risk enhancers are also strongly correlated with anatomical severity. while some have shown that only few of these factors are good predictors of anatomical severity (Banerjee et al, 2012;Krishnaswami et al, 1994). Different study designs and geographic and ethnic factors are responsible for this.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The association of these risk factors with presence of CAD and its harmful effects is well established. Less consistency has found among risk enhancers and CAD severity on correlation, and many studies have produced conflicting results (Banerjee et al, 2012;Koliaki et al, 2011;Larifla et al, 2014). Larifla et al conducted a study to find the association of these factors and disease severity in coronaries and found that diabetes and male gender are independent risk factors of severity of CAD (Larifla et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%