2009
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.24385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family history of hormonal cancers and colorectal cancer risk: A case‐control study conducted in Ontario

Abstract: Aggregation of cancers among families with highly penetrant genetic mutations such as hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer is well-described. However, there is a paucity of data regarding familial aggregation of hormonal cancers (cancers of the breast, endometrial, ovarian and prostate) and colorectal cancer (CRC) in the general population. We investigated the association between having a first-degree family history of breast, endometrial, ovarian, or prostate cancer and CRC risk. Population-based CRC cas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The response of the population-based probands approached to participate was 72% (49). MMR gene and MUTYH mutation carriers have both been associated with better colorectal cancer survival than non-carriers (5052).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The response of the population-based probands approached to participate was 72% (49). MMR gene and MUTYH mutation carriers have both been associated with better colorectal cancer survival than non-carriers (5052).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our recruitment rate of 64% is a true ascertainment rate for the population under study. Considering this is a retrospective study, all eligible cases included the deceased, and our initial contact with the patients was through their family physicians (due to Research Ethics Board requirements), this rate is quite high 32 33. Our study's recruitment rate may have increased if we recruited at the time of diagnosis or at time of surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been inconsistency on reporting a positive association between family history of endometrial cancer and risk of endometrial cancer [514], or between family history of colorectal cancer and risk of endometrial cancer [8, 1114], or between family history of endometrial cancer and risk of colorectal cancer [6, 11, 15, 16]. All of these studies except two [12, 14] did not exclude Lynch syndrome families in which colorectal and endometrial cancers occurred in multiple family members.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these studies except two [12, 14] did not exclude Lynch syndrome families in which colorectal and endometrial cancers occurred in multiple family members. Further, these studies were limited as they only considered for first-degree relatives [513, 15, 16], or only included women aged <55 years [8, 10] or women aged 55 years and above [5, 9]. The aim of this study was to investigate whether risk of endometrial cancer for women without a MMR gene mutation depend on a family history of endometrial cancer or colorectal cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%