2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-020-01389-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family history of prostate cancer and prostate tumor aggressiveness in black and non-black men;results from an equal access biopsy study

Abstract: Purpose To test for racial differences in associations between family history (FH) of prostate cancer (PC) and prostate cancer aggressiveness in a racially diverse equal access population undergoing prostate biopsy. Subjects/patients and methods We prospectively enrolled men undergoing prostate biopsy at the Durham Veterans Administration from 2007 to 2018 and assigned case or control status based on biopsy results. Race and FH of PC were self-reported on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it's crucial to highlight that this racial distinction did not reach statistical significance, and there was no observable interaction between family history of prostate cancer and race in predicting the probability of high-grade prostate cancer. Furthermore, the lack of information about a family history of prostate cancer did not yield any association with prostate cancer, whether it was of low or high grade, in the entire cohort, or when examined within different racial groups [ 27 ].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it's crucial to highlight that this racial distinction did not reach statistical significance, and there was no observable interaction between family history of prostate cancer and race in predicting the probability of high-grade prostate cancer. Furthermore, the lack of information about a family history of prostate cancer did not yield any association with prostate cancer, whether it was of low or high grade, in the entire cohort, or when examined within different racial groups [ 27 ].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most population studies investigating the relationship between family history and Pca have primarily involved men from white populations, and it is uncertain if the results apply to the black population, as highlighted by Jenkins et al in 2021. 4 It is worth noting that oncogenes, which are associated with a poorer clinical prognosis, 5 may be more prevalent in certain ethnic and racial groups. [6][7][8][9] Thus, the rare allele present may be a genetic signature of a particular population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A family history of Pca is linked to an increased risk of high‐grade disease, particularly in black men, who are more likely to be diagnosed with a more aggressive form of the disease on biopsy than non‐Black men. However, most population studies investigating the relationship between family history and Pca have primarily involved men from white populations, and it is uncertain if the results apply to the black population, as highlighted by Jenkins et al in 2021 4 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences are in large part because of socioeconomic inequalities and unequal access and receipt of care, but studies have shown that after attempting to control for these factors, a disparity persists, suggesting that biologic factors are also implicated [19,20]. A recent prospective study suggested that African American men might benefit from earlier screening or more aggressive screening protocols, especially if the family history is positive [21]. But overall, most studies evaluating family history have been mainly constituted of Caucasian men, so less is known about the impact of a positive family history in African American men.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%