2013
DOI: 10.1093/deafed/ent019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family Influences on the Cognitive Development of Profoundly Deaf Children: Exploring the Effects of Socioeconomic Status and Siblings

Abstract: We evaluated the cognitive development of 48 profoundly deaf children from hearing families (born 1994-2002, mean age M = 8.0 years at time of test, none of whom had received early auditory-verbal therapy) as a function of family socioeconomic status and number of siblings. Overall, the deaf children matched a younger group of 47 hearing controls (M = 4.6 years) on verbal ability, theory of mind, and cognitive inhibition. Partial correlations (controlling for age) revealed positive relations in the hearing gro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, a larger family size likely also means more noise and overlapping speech in the home. At the same time, a larger number of siblings can have a negative impact on development (Downey, 2001;Macaulay & Ford, 2013). Thus, when comparing children with different socioeconomic backgrounds or family sizes, developmental differences that might look like the effect of a poorer language environment could actually be the result of noisier home environments or a stronger dilution of parental resources (Downey, 2001).…”
Section: Causes and Consequences Of Disagreements And Biasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, a larger family size likely also means more noise and overlapping speech in the home. At the same time, a larger number of siblings can have a negative impact on development (Downey, 2001;Macaulay & Ford, 2013). Thus, when comparing children with different socioeconomic backgrounds or family sizes, developmental differences that might look like the effect of a poorer language environment could actually be the result of noisier home environments or a stronger dilution of parental resources (Downey, 2001).…”
Section: Causes and Consequences Of Disagreements And Biasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macaulay et al [17] señalan que la falta de fluidez en LS por parte de las madres se relaciona con el retraso de los niños sordos en ToM. Los niños de ambos grupos que procedían de familias más numerosas y de mayor nivel socioeconómico eran significativamente mejor que los niños que procedían de familias más reducidas.…”
Section: Estudios Comparativos De Interacciones De Madres Oyentes Conunclassified
“…We also cannot know whether socioeconomic status plays a role in our sample because this information was not collected. On average, families with deaf children are socioeconomically disadvantaged compared with the general population (Boss, Niparko, Gaskin, & Levinson, 2011), and this fact may negatively affect linguistic and cognitive outcomes (Macaulay & Ford, 2013).…”
Section: Limitations Of the Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%